Department of Family Medicine and Community Health John A. Burns School of Medicine University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI, USA.
Clin J Sport Med. 2013 Jan;23(1):85-6. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31827e9f40.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a 10-week hamstring exercise training program in reducing the incidence and severity of new and recurrent hamstring injuries among male soccer players. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized (by team)controlled trial, stratified by level of play and geographic location. Sample size was calculated with 80% power to show a relative risk reduction for injury of 50% at P ≤ 0.05. SETTING: Soccer community study in Denmark during the period January to December 2008. PARTICIPANTS: Teams in the top 5 soccer divisions (2 professional and 3 amateur)were invited to participate. The exclusion criterion for teams was that they already used eccentric hamstring exercises, and for participants was that they joined the teams after the beginning of the season. Of 116 teams, 54 were eligible and willing to be randomized and 50 were included in the analysis (942 players). INTERVENTION: Teams in both the intervention and control groups followed their normal training programs. At the beginning of the study period, the intervention teams added 27 sessions of the Nordicham string exercise (after warm-up) during the 10-week period of the mid-season break. The exercise begins with the player kneeling with the torso upright and rigid, and the feet held down to the ground by a partner. The player lowers his torso forwards toward the ground braking with his hamstring muscles until the chest reaches the ground (eccentric phase). He returns to the upright position, pushing with his hands to minimize the concentric phase load. Sessions per week and sets and repetitions per session increased to 3, 3, and 12, respectively. Team coaches supervised the sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A hamstring injury was defined as an acute occurrence of a “physical complaint in the region of the posterior thigh sustained during a soccer match or training, irrespective of the need for medical attention or time loss from soccer activities.” Injuries were recorded by the teams’ medical staff on standardized forms. Only first injuries during the season were included and recorded as first-time injuries or recurrences of injuries sustained before the season.Severity of injury was defined by number of days lost from full participation in games and practices. MAIN RESULTS: Injury rates per 100 player sessions were lower for the intervention group (3.8) than for the control group(13.1); thus, the rate ratio (RR) adjusted for age, level of competition, and previous injury was 0.293 (95% confidence interval[CI], 0.150-0.572). Both rates of new and recurrent injuries were lower for the intervention group than for the control group(new injuries: RR, 0.410; 95% CI, 0.180-0.933; recurrent injuries: RR, 0.137; 95% CI, 0.037-0.509). The 15 injuries in the intervention group resulted in absence of 454 days from soccer (mean, 30.3; SD, 18.3; range, 7-64 days per injury), whereas 51 injuries in the control group resulted in 1344 days absent (mean, 26.4; SD, 19.5; range, 4-89 days per injury). Mean severity of injuries (days absent) was not significantly different (P = 0.16) between groups. Delayed onset muscle soreness,but no other adverse effect, was reported by most members of the intervention group during the training period. CONCLUSIONS: An eccentric hamstring exercise program was associated with lower rates of new and recurrent hamstring injuries in Danish male soccer players.
目的:研究 10 周腘绳肌训练计划对减少男性足球运动员新伤和复发性腘绳肌损伤的发生率和严重程度的效果。
设计:按团队(通过团队)进行随机对照试验,按比赛水平和地理位置分层。根据 80%的功效计算样本量,以显示 P≤0.05 时损伤的相对风险降低 50%。
设置:丹麦足球社区研究,2008 年 1 月至 12 月期间。
参与者:邀请顶级 5 个足球联赛(2 个职业联赛和 3 个业余联赛)的球队参加。球队的排除标准是已经使用离心腘绳肌练习,而参与者的排除标准是在赛季开始后加入球队。在 116 支球队中,有 54 支有资格且愿意被随机分组,50 支球队被纳入分析(942 名球员)。
干预措施:干预组和对照组的球队都遵循正常的训练计划。在研究期间开始时,干预组在赛季中期休息的 10 周内增加了 27 次北欧绳肌练习(热身结束后)。练习开始时,球员跪在地上,身体挺直,双脚被伙伴压在地上。运动员向前降低他的身体朝向地面,用他的腿筋肌肉进行制动,直到胸部触地(离心阶段)。他回到直立位置,用手推以最小化向心阶段的负荷。每周的课程和设置以及每次课程的重复次数分别增加到 3、3 和 12。团队教练监督课程。
主要结果测量:腘绳肌损伤定义为“在足球比赛或训练中发生的后大腿区域的急性身体抱怨,无论是否需要医疗关注或因足球活动而损失时间”。损伤由球队的医务人员在标准化表格上记录。仅包括赛季中的首次损伤,并记录为首次损伤或赛季前受伤的复发。损伤严重程度定义为完全参加比赛和训练的天数损失。
主要结果:干预组(3.8)的损伤发生率低于对照组(13.1);因此,年龄、比赛水平和既往损伤调整后的比率(RR)为 0.293(95%置信区间[CI],0.150-0.572)。干预组的新发和复发性损伤发生率均低于对照组(新发损伤:RR,0.410;95%CI,0.180-0.933;复发性损伤:RR,0.137;95%CI,0.037-0.509)。干预组的 15 次损伤导致 454 天无法参加足球比赛(平均 30.3;标准差,18.3;范围,7-64 天/次损伤),而对照组的 51 次损伤导致 1344 天无法参加比赛(平均 26.4;标准差,19.5;范围,4-89 天/次损伤)。两组间损伤严重程度(缺席天数)无显著差异(P=0.16)。干预组的大多数成员在训练期间报告了延迟发作的肌肉酸痛,但没有其他不良反应。
结论:丹麦男性足球运动员中,离心腘绳肌训练计划与新发和复发性腘绳肌损伤的发生率较低有关。
Clin J Sport Med. 2013-1
Clin J Sport Med. 2013-11
Clin J Sport Med. 2013-9
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018-7
Br J Sports Med. 2015-5
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014-2-24