• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植受者的急性呼吸衰竭

Acute Respiratory Failure in Cardiac Transplant Recipients.

作者信息

Komurcu Ozgur, Ozdemirkan Aycan, Camkiran Firat Aynur, Zeyneloglu Pinar, Sezgin Atilla, Pirat Arash

机构信息

From Baskent University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Nov;13 Suppl 3:22-5. doi: 10.6002/ect.tdtd2015.O14.

DOI:10.6002/ect.tdtd2015.O14
PMID:26640904
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in cardiac transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cardiac transplant recipients >15 years of age and readmitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac transplant between 2005 and 2015 were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included in the final analyses. Patients with acute respiratory failure and without acute respiratory failure were compared. The most frequent causes of readmission were routine intensive care unit follow-up after endomyocardial biopsy, heart failure, sepsis, and pneumonia. Patients who were readmitted to the intensive care unit were further divided into 2 groups based on presence of acute respiratory failure. Patients' ages and body weights did not differ between groups. The groups were not different in terms of comorbidities. The admission sequential organ failure assessment scores were higher in patients with acute respiratory failure. Patients with acute respiratory failure were more likely to use bronchodilators and n-acetylcysteine before readmission. Mean peak inspiratory pressures were higher in patients in acute respiratory failure. Patients with acute respiratory failure developed sepsis more frequently and they were more likely to have hypotension. Patients with acute respiratory failure had higher values of serum creatinine before admission to intensive care unit and in the first day of intensive care unit. Patients with acute respiratory failure had more frequent bilateral opacities on chest radiographs and positive blood and urine cultures. Duration of intensive care unit and hospital stays were not statistically different between groups. Mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure was 76.5% compared with 0% in patients without acute respiratory failure.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of cardiac transplant recipients were readmitted to the intensive care unit. Patients presenting with acute respiratory failure on readmission more frequently developed sepsis and hypotension, suggesting a poorer prognosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估心脏移植受者急性呼吸衰竭的发生率、危险因素及预后。

材料与方法

纳入2005年至2015年间年龄大于15岁且心脏移植后再次入住重症监护病房的心脏移植受者。

结果

最终分析纳入39例患者。对发生急性呼吸衰竭和未发生急性呼吸衰竭的患者进行了比较。再次入院最常见的原因是心内膜心肌活检后的常规重症监护病房随访、心力衰竭、败血症和肺炎。根据是否存在急性呼吸衰竭,将再次入住重症监护病房的患者进一步分为两组。两组患者的年龄和体重无差异。两组在合并症方面无差异。急性呼吸衰竭患者的入院序贯器官衰竭评估评分更高。发生急性呼吸衰竭的患者在再次入院前更有可能使用支气管扩张剂和N-乙酰半胱氨酸。急性呼吸衰竭患者的平均吸气峰压更高。急性呼吸衰竭患者更频繁地发生败血症,且更有可能出现低血压。急性呼吸衰竭患者在入住重症监护病房前及入住重症监护病房第一天的血清肌酐值更高。急性呼吸衰竭患者胸部X线片上双侧模糊影更常见,血培养和尿培养阳性。两组患者在重症监护病房和住院时间上无统计学差异。急性呼吸衰竭患者的死亡率为76.5%,而未发生急性呼吸衰竭的患者死亡率为0%。

结论

相当数量的心脏移植受者再次入住重症监护病房。再次入院时出现急性呼吸衰竭的患者更频繁地发生败血症和低血压,提示预后较差。

相似文献

1
Acute Respiratory Failure in Cardiac Transplant Recipients.心脏移植受者的急性呼吸衰竭
Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Nov;13 Suppl 3:22-5. doi: 10.6002/ect.tdtd2015.O14.
2
Late Intensive Care Unit Admission in Liver Transplant Recipients: 10-Year Experience.肝移植受者的晚期重症监护病房入院:10年经验
Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Nov;13 Suppl 3:15-21. doi: 10.6002/ect.tdtd2015.O10.
3
Acute Respiratory Failure in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single Intensive Care Unit Experience.肾移植受者的急性呼吸衰竭:单重症监护病房经验
Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Nov;13 Suppl 3:44-7. doi: 10.6002/ect.tdtd2015.O37.
4
How do COPD comorbidities affect ICU outcomes?慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的合并症如何影响重症监护病房(ICU)的治疗结果?
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Oct 17;9:1187-96. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S70257. eCollection 2014.
5
Hospital outcomes for patients with stage III and IV lung cancer admitted to the intensive care unit for sepsis-related acute respiratory failure.因脓毒症相关急性呼吸衰竭入住重症监护病房的 III 期和 IV 期肺癌患者的医院转归。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Nov;15(11):1234-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0084. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
6
Acute Respiratory Failure in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Experience.肾移植受者的急性呼吸衰竭:单中心经验
Exp Clin Transplant. 2019 Jan;17(Suppl 1):172-174. doi: 10.6002/ect.MESOT2018.P49.
7
Humidified high flow nasal cannula supportive therapy improves outcomes in lung transplant recipients readmitted to the intensive care unit because of acute respiratory failure.因急性呼吸衰竭再次入住重症监护病房的肺移植受者,采用高流量鼻导管湿化支持治疗可改善其预后。
Transplantation. 2015 May;99(5):1092-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000460.
8
Prognosis factors in lung transplant recipients readmitted to the intensive care unit.再次入住重症监护病房的肺移植受者的预后因素
Transplant Proc. 2007 Sep;39(7):2420-1. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.058.
9
Posttransplant Pneumonia Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Followed in Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中实体器官移植受者的移植后肺炎
Exp Clin Transplant. 2022 Jan;20(1):83-90. doi: 10.6002/ect.2021.0215. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
Receiving early mobility during an intensive care unit admission is a predictor of improved outcomes in acute respiratory failure.在入住重症监护病房期间尽早进行活动是急性呼吸衰竭患者预后改善的预测指标。
Am J Med Sci. 2011 May;341(5):373-7. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31820ab4f6.

引用本文的文献

1
Gram-negative bacteremia in solid organ transplant recipients: Clinical characteristics and outcomes as compared to immunocompetent non-transplant recipients.实体器官移植受者中的革兰氏阴性菌血症:与免疫功能正常的非移植受者相比的临床特征和结局。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;24(6):e13969. doi: 10.1111/tid.13969. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
2
Acute respiratory failure in immunocompromised adults.免疫功能低下成人的急性呼吸衰竭。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):173-186. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30345-X. Epub 2018 Dec 7.