Suppr超能文献

高等教育高风险考试中引入基于计算机的测试:一项实地实验的结果

Introducing Computer-Based Testing in High-Stakes Exams in Higher Education: Results of a Field Experiment.

作者信息

Boevé Anja J, Meijer Rob R, Albers Casper J, Beetsma Yta, Bosker Roel J

机构信息

Department of Psychometrics and Statistics at the Heymans Institute of the University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Donald Smits Center for Information Technology, Educational Support and Innovation at the University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0143616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143616. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The introduction of computer-based testing in high-stakes examining in higher education is developing rather slowly due to institutional barriers (the need of extra facilities, ensuring test security) and teacher and student acceptance. From the existing literature it is unclear whether computer-based exams will result in similar results as paper-based exams and whether student acceptance can change as a result of administering computer-based exams. In this study, we compared results from a computer-based and paper-based exam in a sample of psychology students and found no differences in total scores across the two modes. Furthermore, we investigated student acceptance and change in acceptance of computer-based examining. After taking the computer-based exam, fifty percent of the students preferred paper-and-pencil exams over computer-based exams and about a quarter preferred a computer-based exam. We conclude that computer-based exam total scores are similar as paper-based exam scores, but that for the acceptance of high-stakes computer-based exams it is important that students practice and get familiar with this new mode of test administration.

摘要

由于制度障碍(需要额外设施、确保考试安全)以及教师和学生的接受度问题,高等教育高风险考试中基于计算机的测试引入进展相当缓慢。从现有文献来看,尚不清楚基于计算机的考试是否会产生与纸质考试类似的结果,以及实施基于计算机的考试是否会导致学生接受度发生变化。在本研究中,我们比较了心理学专业学生样本中基于计算机的考试和纸质考试的结果,发现两种模式的总分没有差异。此外,我们调查了学生对基于计算机考试的接受度以及接受度的变化。在参加基于计算机的考试后,50%的学生更喜欢纸笔考试而非基于计算机的考试,约四分之一的学生更喜欢基于计算机的考试。我们得出结论,基于计算机的考试总分与纸质考试成绩相似,但对于高风险基于计算机的考试的接受度而言,学生进行练习并熟悉这种新的考试管理模式很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/4671535/f3e9f26a01a9/pone.0143616.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验