Tuna Deniz, Lefrancois Daniel, Wolański Łukasz, Gozem Samer, Schapiro Igor, Andruniów Tadeusz, Dreuw Andreas, Olivucci Massimo
Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung , 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, University of Heidelberg , 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2015 Dec 8;11(12):5758-81. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00022. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
As a minimal model of the chromophore of rhodopsin proteins, the penta-2,4-dieniminium cation (PSB3) poses a challenging test system for the assessment of electronic-structure methods for the exploration of ground- and excited-state potential-energy surfaces, the topography of conical intersections, and the dimensionality (topology) of the branching space. Herein, we report on the performance of the approximate linear-response coupled-cluster method of second order (CC2) and the algebraic-diagrammatic-construction scheme of the polarization propagator of second and third orders (ADC(2) and ADC(3)). For the ADC(2) method, we considered both the strict and extended variants (ADC(2)-s and ADC(2)-x). For both CC2 and ADC methods, we also tested the spin-component-scaled (SCS) and spin-opposite-scaled (SOS) variants. We have explored several ground- and excited-state reaction paths, a circular path centered around the S1/S0 surface crossing, and a 2D scan of the potential-energy surfaces along the branching space. We find that the CC2 and ADC methods yield a different dimensionality of the intersection space. While the ADC methods yield a linear intersection topology, we find a conical intersection topology for the CC2 method. We present computational evidence showing that the linear-response CC2 method yields a surface crossing between the reference state and the first response state featuring characteristics that are expected for a true conical intersection. Finally, we test the performance of these methods for the approximate geometry optimization of the S1/S0 minimum-energy conical intersection and compare the geometries with available data from multireference methods. The present study provides new insight into the performance of linear-response CC2 and polarization-propagator ADC methods for molecular electronic spectroscopy and applications in computational photochemistry.
作为视紫红质蛋白发色团的最小模型,戊 - 2,4 - 二烯亚胺阳离子(PSB3)为评估用于探索基态和激发态势能面、锥形交叉点的拓扑结构以及分支空间的维度(拓扑)的电子结构方法提供了一个具有挑战性的测试系统。在此,我们报告二阶近似线性响应耦合簇方法(CC2)以及二阶和三阶极化传播子的代数图示构建方案(ADC(2)和ADC(3))的性能。对于ADC(2)方法,我们考虑了严格和扩展变体(ADC(2)-s和ADC(2)-x)。对于CC2和ADC方法,我们还测试了自旋分量缩放(SCS)和自旋相反缩放(SOS)变体。我们探索了几条基态和激发态反应路径、围绕S1/S0表面交叉点的圆形路径以及沿分支空间的势能面二维扫描。我们发现CC2和ADC方法产生的交叉空间维度不同。虽然ADC方法产生线性交叉拓扑,但我们发现CC2方法具有锥形交叉拓扑。我们提供的计算证据表明,线性响应CC2方法在参考态和第一响应态之间产生了一个表面交叉,其特征符合真正锥形交叉的预期。最后,我们测试了这些方法对S1/S0最小能量锥形交叉点近似几何优化的性能,并将几何结构与多参考方法的可用数据进行比较。本研究为线性响应CC2和极化传播子ADC方法在分子电子光谱学及计算光化学应用中的性能提供了新的见解。