Scheifes Arlette, Walraven Sanne, Stolker Joost Jan, Nijman Henk L I, Egberts Toine C G, Heerdink Eibert R
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands; Altrecht Aventurijn, Vuurvlinder 4, 3734 AB, Den Dolder, The Netherlands.
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, PO Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
Psychotropic drugs are prescribed to approximately 30-40% of adults with intellectual disability (ID) and challenging behaviour, despite the limited evidence of effectiveness and the potential of adverse events.
To assess the prevalence of adverse events in association with psychotropic drug use in adults with ID and challenging behaviour and to examine the relation of these adverse events with the person's quality of life.
The presence of adverse events was measured with a questionnaire that had to be filled in by the physicians of the participants. Movement disorders were measured separately with a standardised protocol. The strength of the association between adverse events and Intellectual Disability Quality of Life-16 (IDQOL-16), and daily functioning was investigated using linear regression analyses, taking into account the severity of disease (CGI-S) as potential confounder.
Virtually all of 103 adults with ID and challenging behaviour had at least one adverse event (84.4%) and almost half had ≥3 adverse events (45.6%) across different subclasses. Using psychotropic drugs increased the prevalence of adverse events significantly. Respectively 13% of the patients without psychotropic drugs and 61% of the patients with ≥2 psychotropic drugs had ≥3 adverse events. Having adverse events had a significantly negative influence on the quality of life.
A large majority of all patients had at least one adverse event associated with psychotropic drug use. More attention is needed for these adverse events and their negative influence on the quality of life of these patients, taking into account the lack of evidence of effectiveness of psychotropic drugs for challenging behaviour.
尽管疗效证据有限且存在不良事件风险,但约30%-40%的成年智力残疾(ID)患者及有挑战行为的患者会使用精神药物。
评估成年ID患者及有挑战行为者使用精神药物相关不良事件的发生率,并研究这些不良事件与患者生活质量的关系。
通过参与者的医生填写的问卷来衡量不良事件的存在情况。使用标准化方案单独测量运动障碍。考虑到疾病严重程度(CGI-S)作为潜在混杂因素,采用线性回归分析研究不良事件与智力残疾生活质量-16(IDQOL-16)以及日常功能之间的关联强度。
在103名成年ID患者及有挑战行为者中,几乎所有人(84.4%)至少有一项不良事件,近一半(45.6%)在不同亚类中出现≥3项不良事件。使用精神药物显著增加了不良事件的发生率。未使用精神药物的患者中分别有13%以及使用≥2种精神药物的患者中有61%出现≥3项不良事件。出现不良事件对生活质量有显著负面影响。
绝大多数患者至少有一项与使用精神药物相关的不良事件。鉴于精神药物对挑战行为疗效证据不足,需要更多关注这些不良事件及其对患者生活质量的负面影响。