全科医学定性研究中的理论与阐释:为何以及如何?

Theory and interpretation in qualitative studies from general practice: Why and how?

作者信息

Malterud Kirsti

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice, Uni Health Research, Bergen, Norway Research Unit for General Practice in Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2016 Mar;44(2):120-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494815621181. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this article, I want to promote theoretical awareness and commitment among qualitative researchers in general practice and suggest adequate and feasible theoretical approaches.

APPROACH

I discuss different theoretical aspects of qualitative research and present the basic foundations of the interpretative paradigm. Associations between paradigms, philosophies, methodologies and methods are examined and different strategies for theoretical commitment presented. Finally, I discuss the impact of theory for interpretation and the development of general practice knowledge.

MAIN POINTS

A scientific theory is a consistent and soundly based set of assumptions about a specific aspect of the world, predicting or explaining a phenomenon. Qualitative research is situated in an interpretative paradigm where notions about particular human experiences in context are recognized from different subject positions. Basic theoretical features from the philosophy of science explain why and how this is different from positivism. Reflexivity, including theoretical awareness and consistency, demonstrates interpretative assumptions, accounting for situated knowledge. Different types of theoretical commitment in qualitative analysis are presented, emphasizing substantive theories to sharpen the interpretative focus. Such approaches are clearly within reach for a general practice researcher contributing to clinical practice by doing more than summarizing what the participants talked about, without trying to become a philosopher.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative studies from general practice deserve stronger theoretical awareness and commitment than what is currently established. Persistent attention to and respect for the distinctive domain of knowledge and practice where the research deliveries are targeted is necessary to choose adequate theoretical endeavours.

摘要

目标

在本文中,我希望提升全科医疗质性研究者的理论意识并促使他们坚定理论信念,同时提出适当且可行的理论方法。

方法

我将探讨质性研究的不同理论层面,并阐述诠释范式的基本基础。审视范式、哲学、方法论与方法之间的关联,呈现不同的理论信念策略。最后,我将讨论理论对诠释以及全科医疗知识发展的影响。

要点

科学理论是关于世界特定方面的一组连贯且有充分依据的假设,用于预测或解释一种现象。质性研究处于诠释范式之中,在此范式下,从不同主体立场出发可识别关于特定情境中人类经验的概念。科学哲学的基本理论特征解释了为何以及如何它与实证主义不同。反思性,包括理论意识与连贯性,展示了诠释性假设,说明了情境化知识。介绍了质性分析中不同类型的理论信念,强调实质性理论以强化诠释焦点。对于全科医疗研究者而言,此类方法显然是可行的,他们通过不仅仅总结参与者的谈话内容,还为临床实践做出贡献,而无需试图成为哲学家。

结论

全科医疗的质性研究应具备比当前更强的理论意识和理论信念。持续关注并尊重研究成果所针对的独特知识与实践领域,对于选择适当的理论探索而言是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索