NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Centre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, UK.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Sep;25(9):716-25. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004453. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Despite taking advantage of established learning from other industries, quality improvement initiatives in healthcare may struggle to outperform secular trends. The reasons for this are rarely explored in detail, and are often attributed merely to difficulties in engaging clinicians in quality improvement work. In a narrative review of the literature, we argue that this focus on clinicians, at the relative expense of managerial staff, has proven counterproductive. Clinical engagement is not a universal challenge; moreover, there is evidence that managers-particularly middle managers-also have a role to play in quality improvement. Yet managerial participation in quality improvement interventions is often assumed, rather than proven. We identify specific factors that influence the coordination of front-line staff and managers in quality improvement, and integrate these factors into a novel model: the model of alignment. We use this model to explore the implementation of an interdisciplinary intervention in a recent trial, describing different participation incentives and barriers for different staff groups. The extent to which clinical and managerial interests align may be an important determinant of the ultimate success of quality improvement interventions.
尽管利用了其他行业已有的学习成果,但医疗保健领域的质量改进举措可能难以超越长期趋势。很少有详细探讨出现这种情况的原因,通常只是归因于让临床医生参与质量改进工作存在困难。在对文献的叙述性回顾中,我们认为这种关注临床医生而相对忽视管理人员的做法适得其反。临床参与并不是普遍存在的挑战;此外,有证据表明,管理者——尤其是中层管理者——在质量改进方面也有作用。然而,管理人员参与质量改进干预措施往往是假设的,而不是经过证明的。我们确定了影响质量改进中一线员工和管理人员协调的具体因素,并将这些因素整合到一个新模型中:协调模型。我们使用该模型来探讨最近一项试验中一项跨学科干预措施的实施情况,描述不同员工群体的不同参与激励因素和障碍。临床和管理利益的一致性程度可能是质量改进干预措施最终成功的一个重要决定因素。