Madrigal Vanessa N, Carroll Karen W, Faerber Jennifer A, Walter Jennifer K, Morrison Wynne E, Feudtner Chris
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Medical Center; George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;169:221-6.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.061. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
To assess sources of support and guidance on which parents rely when making difficult decisions in the pediatric intensive care unit and to evaluate associations of sources of support and guidance to anxiety, depression, and positive and negative affect.
This was a prospective cohort study of 86 English-speaking parents of 75 children in the pediatric intensive care unit at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia who were hospitalized greater than 72 hours. Parents completed standardized instruments and a novel sources of support and guidance assessment.
Most parents chose physicians, nurses, friends, and extended family as their main sources of support and guidance when making a difficult decision. Descriptive analysis revealed a broad distribution for the sources of support and guidance items related to spirituality. Parents tended to fall into 1 of 2 groups when we used latent class analysis: the more-spiritual group (n = 47; 55%) highly ranked "what my child wants" (P = .023), spouses (P = .002), support groups (P = .003), church community (P < .001), spiritual leader (P < .001), higher power (P < .001), and prayer (P < .001) compared with the less-spiritual group (n = 39; 45%). The more-spiritual parents had greater positive affect scores (P = .005). Less-spiritual parents had greater depression scores (P = .043).
Parents rely most on physicians, nurses, and friends and extended family when making difficult decisions for their critically ill child. Respondents tended to fall into 1 of 2 groups where the more-spiritual respondents were associated with greater positive affect and may be more resistant to depression.
评估家长在儿科重症监护病房做出艰难决策时所依赖的支持和指导来源,并评估支持和指导来源与焦虑、抑郁以及正负性情绪之间的关联。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为费城儿童医院儿科重症监护病房中75名住院超过72小时的儿童的86位讲英语的家长。家长们完成了标准化工具和一项新颖的支持和指导来源评估。
大多数家长在做出艰难决策时选择医生、护士、朋友和大家庭作为他们主要的支持和指导来源。描述性分析显示,与灵性相关的支持和指导项目分布广泛。当我们使用潜在类别分析时,家长往往分为两组之一:较具灵性的一组(n = 47;55%)相比灵性较低的一组(n = 39;45%),对“孩子的意愿”(P = .023)、配偶(P = .002)、支持小组(P = .003)、教会团体(P < .001)、精神领袖(P < .001)、更高力量(P < .001)和祈祷(P < .001)的排名更高。较具灵性的家长有更高的正性情绪得分(P = .005)。灵性较低的家长有更高的抑郁得分(P = .043)。
家长在为重症患儿做出艰难决策时,最依赖医生、护士、朋友和大家庭。受访者倾向于分为两组之一,其中较具灵性的受访者与更大的正性情绪相关,可能对抑郁更具抵抗力。