Meszaros Katharina, Fuehrer Urs, Grogg Sina, Sodeck Gottfried, Czerny Martin, Marschall Jonas, Carrel Thierry
Department for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department for General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
This study evaluated whether risk factors for sternal wound infections vary with the type of surgical procedure in cardiac operations.
This was a university hospital surveillance study of 3,249 consecutive patients (28% women) from 2006 to 2010 (median age, 69 years [interquartile range, 60 to 76]; median additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score, 5 [interquartile range, 3 to 8]) after (1) isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), (2) isolated valve repair or replacement, or (3) combined valve procedures and CABG. All other operations were excluded. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression were conducted to identify independent predictors for development of sternal wound infections.
We detected 122 sternal wound infections (3.8%) in 3,249 patients: 74 of 1,857 patients (4.0%) after CABG, 19 of 799 (2.4%) after valve operations, and 29 of 593 (4.9%) after combined procedures. In CABG patients, bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest, procedural duration exceeding 300 minutes, diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and female sex (model 1) were independent predictors for sternal wound infection. A second model (model 2), using the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, revealed bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest, diabetes, obesity, and the second and third quartiles of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation were independent predictors. In valve patients, model 1 showed only revision for bleeding as an independent predictor for sternal infection, and model 2 yielded both revision for bleeding and diabetes. For combined valve and CABG operations, both regression models demonstrated revision for bleeding and duration of operation exceeding 300 minutes were independent predictors for sternal infection.
Risk factors for sternal wound infections after cardiac operations vary with the type of surgical procedure. In patients undergoing valve operations or combined operations, procedure-related risk factors (revision for bleeding, duration of operation) independently predict infection. In patients undergoing CABG, not only procedure-related risk factors but also bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and patient characteristics (diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, female sex) are predictive of sternal wound infection. Preventive interventions may be justified according to the type of operation.
本研究评估了心脏手术中胸骨伤口感染的危险因素是否因手术类型而异。
这是一项大学医院的监测研究,纳入了2006年至2010年连续的3249例患者(28%为女性)(年龄中位数为69岁[四分位间距为60至76岁];欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统相加评分中位数为5[四分位间距为3至8]),这些患者接受了(1)单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、(2)单纯瓣膜修复或置换术,或(3)瓣膜手术与CABG联合手术。排除所有其他手术。进行单因素和多因素二元逻辑回归以确定胸骨伤口感染发生的独立预测因素。
我们在3249例患者中检测到122例胸骨伤口感染(3.8%):CABG术后1857例患者中有74例(4.0%),瓣膜手术后799例中有19例(2.4%),联合手术后593例中有29例(4.9%)。在CABG患者中,双侧胸廓内动脉采集、手术时间超过300分钟、糖尿病、肥胖、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和女性(模型1)是胸骨伤口感染的独立预测因素。使用欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统的第二个模型(模型2)显示,双侧胸廓内动脉采集、糖尿病、肥胖以及欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统的第二和第三四分位数是独立预测因素。在瓣膜手术患者中,模型1仅显示因出血进行的再次手术是胸骨感染的独立预测因素,模型2得出因出血进行的再次手术和糖尿病均是独立预测因素。对于瓣膜手术与CABG联合手术,两个回归模型均显示因出血进行的再次手术和手术时间超过300分钟是胸骨感染的独立预测因素。
心脏手术后胸骨伤口感染的危险因素因手术类型而异。在接受瓣膜手术或联合手术的患者中,与手术相关的危险因素(因出血进行的再次手术、手术时间)可独立预测感染。在接受CABG的患者中,不仅与手术相关的危险因素,而且双侧胸廓内动脉采集以及患者特征(糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肥胖、女性)均可预测胸骨伤口感染。可根据手术类型进行预防性干预。