Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Unidad de Posgrado Edificio "C" 1er Piso, Circuito de Posgrados, Avenida Universidad 3000, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México D. F., México; Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Circuito Exterior, Avenida Universidad 3000, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México D.F., México.
Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Edificio "D" Planta Baja, Circuito Interior, Avenida Universidad 3000, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México D.F., México.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Feb;59:930-937. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.094. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
There are different types of tracheal disorders (e.g. cancer, stenosis and fractures). These can cause respiratory failure and lead to death of patients. Several attempts have been made for trachea replacement in order to restore the airway, including anastomosis and implants made from synthetic or natural materials. Tracheal allotransplantation has shown high rejection rates, and decellularization has emerged as a possible solution. Decellularization involves the removal of antigens from cells in the organ or tissue, leaving a matrix that can be used as 3D cell-scaffold. Although this process has been used for tracheal replacement, it usually takes at least two months and time is critical for patients with tracheal disorders. Therefore, there is necessary to develop a tracheal replacement process, which is not only effective, but also quick to prepare. The aim of this research was to develop a faster trachea decellularization protocol using Trypsin enzyme and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as decellularization agents. Three protocols of cyclic trachea decellularization (Protocols A, B, and C) were compared. Following Protocol A (previously described in the literature), 15 consecutive cycles were performed over 32 days. Protocol B (a variation of Protocol A) — EDTA being added — with 15 consecutive cycles performed over 60 days. Finally, Protocol C, with the addition of Trypsin as a decellularization agent, 5 consecutive cycles being performed over 10 days. For the three protocols, hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) staining and DNA residual content quantification were performed to establish the effectiveness of the decellularization process. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the changes in porosity and microarrays. To evaluate the structural matrices integrity, Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) and biomechanical test were used. None of the protocols showed significant alteration or degradation in the components of the extracellular matrix (ECM). However, in Protocol C, more cellular components were removed in less time, making it the most efficient process. In addition, the cell tracking and viability was evaluated with chondrocytes seeding on the scaffold obtained by Protocol C, which showed an adequate cell scaffolding ability of this matrix.
存在不同类型的气管疾病(例如癌症、狭窄和骨折)。这些疾病会导致呼吸衰竭,导致患者死亡。为了恢复气道,人们已经尝试了多种气管替代方法,包括使用合成或天然材料进行吻合和植入。气管同种异体移植的排斥反应率很高,而去细胞化已成为一种可能的解决方案。去细胞化涉及从器官或组织中的细胞中去除抗原,留下可以用作 3D 细胞支架的基质。尽管该过程已用于气管替代,但通常需要至少两个月的时间,而对于患有气管疾病的患者来说,时间至关重要。因此,有必要开发一种气管替代过程,该过程不仅有效,而且准备时间也很快。本研究的目的是开发一种更快的气管去细胞化方案,使用胰蛋白酶和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)作为去细胞化剂。比较了三种周期性气管去细胞化方案(方案 A、B 和 C)。方案 A(文献中已有描述)连续进行了 15 个周期,历时 32 天。方案 B(方案 A 的变体)——加入 EDTA——连续进行了 15 个周期,历时 60 天。最后,方案 C,加入胰蛋白酶作为去细胞化剂,连续进行了 5 个周期,历时 10 天。对于这三种方案,通过苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色和 DNA 残留含量定量来评估去细胞化过程的有效性。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)用于观察孔隙率和微阵列的变化。为了评估结构基质的完整性,使用热重分析(TGA)和生物力学测试。三种方案均未显示细胞外基质(ECM)的组成成分有明显的改变或降解。然而,在方案 C 中,更多的细胞成分在更短的时间内被去除,使其成为最有效的过程。此外,通过在方案 C 获得的支架上接种软骨细胞,评估了细胞跟踪和活力,该支架显示出对这种基质的足够的细胞支架能力。