Kerkhoff W, Stoel R D, Berger C E H, Mattijssen E J A T, Hermsen R, Smits N, Hardy H J J
Netherlands Forensic Institute, Netherlands Forensic Institute, NFI, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Forensic Institute, Netherlands Forensic Institute, NFI, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Sci Justice. 2015 Dec;55(6):514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
In 2010, the Netherlands Forensic Institute (NFI) and the University of Amsterdam (UvA) started a series of tests for the NFI's Firearms Section. Ten cartridge case and bullet comparison tests were submitted by various external parties as regular cases and mixed in the flow of real cases. The results of the tests were evaluated with the VU University Amsterdam (VUA). A total of twenty-nine conclusions were drawn in the ten tests. For nineteen conclusions the submitted cartridge cases or bullets were either fired from the questioned firearm or from one and the same firearm, in tests where no firearm was submitted. For ten conclusions the submitted cartridge cases or bullets were either fired from another firearm than the submitted one or from several firearms, in tests where no firearm was submitted. In none of the conclusions misleading evidence was reported, in the sense that all conclusions supported the true hypothesis. This article discusses the design considerations of the program, contains details of the tests, and describes the various ways the test results were and could be analyzed.
2010年,荷兰法医研究所(NFI)和阿姆斯特丹大学(UvA)为该研究所的枪支部门开展了一系列测试。十个弹壳和子弹比对测试由不同外部机构作为常规案件提交,并混入实际案件流程中。测试结果与阿姆斯特丹自由大学(VUA)进行了评估。在这十次测试中总共得出了29个结论。在19个结论中,提交的弹壳或子弹要么是从涉案枪支发射的,要么是在未提交枪支的测试中从同一支枪支发射的。在10个结论中,提交的弹壳或子弹要么是从提交枪支以外的另一支枪支发射的,要么是在未提交枪支的测试中从几支枪支发射的。在所有结论中均未报告误导性证据,也就是说所有结论都支持了真实假设。本文讨论了该项目的设计考量,包含测试细节,并描述了测试结果已采用和可能采用的各种分析方式。