Suppr超能文献

法医枪支鉴定员比较决策的准确性。

Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners.

机构信息

Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, Quantico, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2023 Jan;68(1):86-100. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15152. Epub 2022 Oct 1.

Abstract

This black box study assessed the performance of forensic firearms examiners in the United States. It involved three different types of firearms and 173 volunteers who performed a total of 8640 comparisons of both bullets and cartridge cases. The overall false-positive error rate was estimated as 0.656% and 0.933% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, while the rate of false negatives was estimated as 2.87% and 1.87% for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The majority of errors were made by a limited number of examiners. Because chi-square tests of independence strongly suggest that error probabilities are not the same for each examiner, these are maximum-likelihood estimates based on the beta-binomial probability model and do not depend on an assumption of equal examiner-specific error rates. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals are (0.305%, 1.42%) and (0.548%, 1.57%) for false positives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively, and (1.89%, 4.26%) and (1.16%, 2.99%) for false negatives for bullets and cartridge cases, respectively. The results of this study are consistent with prior studies, despite its comprehensive design and challenging specimens.

摘要

本黑箱研究评估了美国法医枪支鉴定员的表现。它涉及三种不同类型的枪支和 173 名志愿者,总共进行了 8640 次子弹和弹壳的比对。子弹和弹壳的总体假阳性错误率估计分别为 0.656%和 0.933%,而假阴性率估计分别为 2.87%和 1.87%。大多数错误是由少数鉴定员造成的。由于卡方独立性检验强烈表明每个鉴定员的错误概率并不相同,因此这些是基于贝塔二项式概率模型的最大似然估计,不依赖于鉴定员特定错误率相等的假设。子弹和弹壳的假阳性的相应 95%置信区间分别为(0.305%,1.42%)和(0.548%,1.57%),而子弹和弹壳的假阴性的相应 95%置信区间分别为(1.89%,4.26%)和(1.16%,2.99%)。尽管该研究设计全面且标本具有挑战性,但研究结果与先前的研究一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c588/10092368/e067d699aaf6/JFO-68-86-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验