• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Renal Angiomyolipoma.

作者信息

Kara Onder, Akca Oktay, Zargar Homayoun, Andrade Hiury Silva, Maurice Matthew Joseph, Ramirez Daniel, Caputo Peter, Haber George-Pascal, Kaouk Jihad H, Stein Robert J

机构信息

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):275-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0624. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0624
PMID:26654096
Abstract

PURPOSE

To present the experience and efficacy of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN) for the management of renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) with regard to renal function preservation and perioperative outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively searched our RPN database for pathologically confirmed renal AML patients between 2006 and 2014. Clinical presentation, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcomes of the patients were analyzed. Preoperative imaging findings were reviewed to examine their ability to predict pathology of AML.

RESULTS

From 1005 RPN performed in our center during the study period, 53 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age at presentation was 54.1 (± 13) years, and 42 (79.2%) patients were female. Median tumor size was 2.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.8-4.6) cm. The indication for RPN was suspicious radiologic features for malignancy in 42 (79.2%) patients and acute retroperitoneal hemorrhage risk and pain in 11 (20.8%) patients who were found to have AML according to preoperative imaging. Mean estimated blood loss was 198 (± 194) mL, and 5 (9.4%) patients required blood transfusion. Postoperative complications occurred in 8 (15%) patients. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate within the latest follow-up was 86.9 (IQR, 69.7-100.1) mL/minute/1.73 m(2) with a median of 91% (IQR, 80.4-103) preservation. None of patients developed urinary fistula or pseudoaneurysm requiring second intervention. No local recurrences occurred with a median follow-up of 7 (IQR, 1-17) months.

CONCLUSION

Given the low complication rate and preservation of renal function after RPN for AML, it can be considered a reliable method for AML treatment. The majority of AMLs were not suspected based on preoperative imaging. Further diagnostic methods are needed to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.

摘要

目的

介绍机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RPN)治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(AML)在肾功能保留和围手术期结果方面的经验及疗效。

患者与方法

我们回顾性检索了2006年至2014年间经病理证实的肾AML患者的RPN数据库。分析患者的临床表现、围手术期并发症及术后结果。回顾术前影像学检查结果以评估其预测AML病理的能力。

结果

在研究期间我们中心进行的1005例RPN中,53例患者符合纳入标准。就诊时的平均年龄为54.1(±13)岁,42例(79.2%)为女性。肿瘤中位数大小为2.8(四分位间距[IQR],1.8 - 4.6)cm。RPN的指征为42例(79.2%)患者存在可疑的恶性放射学特征,11例(20.8%)患者根据术前影像学检查发现AML且有急性腹膜后出血风险和疼痛。平均估计失血量为198(±194)mL,5例(9.4%)患者需要输血。8例(15%)患者发生术后并发症。最近一次随访时估计肾小球滤过率中位数为86.9(IQR,69.7 - 100.1)mL/分钟/1.73 m²,保留率中位数为91%(IQR,80.4 - 103)。无一例患者发生需要二次干预的尿瘘或假性动脉瘤。中位随访7(IQR,1 - 17)个月无局部复发。

结论

鉴于RPN治疗AML后的低并发症率及肾功能保留情况,可将其视为治疗AML的可靠方法。大多数AML术前影像学检查未怀疑。需要进一步的诊断方法来区分良性与恶性病变。

相似文献

1
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in the Treatment of Renal Angiomyolipoma.机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤
J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):275-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0624. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
2
Long-term outcome of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal angiomyolipoma.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的长期疗效。
Asian J Surg. 2018 Mar;41(2):187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
3
Safety and early effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for large angiomyolipomas.机器人辅助下大体积肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤部分肾切除术的安全性及早期疗效
BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):755-760. doi: 10.1111/bju.13747. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的 5 年肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
5
Is Extensive Parenchymal Resection During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Justified? A Match-Paired Comparison of Two Extirpative Surgical Modalities for Treatment of a Complex Renal Neoplasm.机器人辅助部分肾切除术中广泛实质切除是否合理?两种治疗复杂肾肿瘤的切除性手术方式的配对比较。
J Endourol. 2016 Apr;30(4):379-83. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0510. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
Emergency retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for ruptured renal angiomyolipomas: a retrospective single-center series of 15 cases.急诊腹膜后腹腔镜下肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤破裂部分肾切除术:一项15例单中心回顾性研究系列
BMC Surg. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00723-w.
7
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores.经腹腔与腹膜后机器人辅助部分肾切除术:基于肾测量评分的配对比较
World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1523-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1312-7. Epub 2014 May 10.
8
Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术治疗复杂肾肿瘤:长期随访的配对比较
World J Urol. 2017 Jan;35(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1849-8. Epub 2016 May 19.
9
R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.R-LESS 部分肾切除术三联征结局劣于多通道机器人辅助部分肾切除术:比较分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.058. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
A Multi-Institutional Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Posterior Tumors.经腹与腹膜后肾部分切除术治疗cT1期肾后肿瘤的多机构倾向评分匹配比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):29-34. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0313. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in Diagnosing Rare Retroperitoneal Tumors: A Case Report of Extrarenal Giant Angiomyolipoma.罕见腹膜后肿瘤的诊断挑战:一例肾外巨大血管平滑肌脂肪瘤病例报告
Case Rep Oncol. 2024 Dec 11;18(1):113-119. doi: 10.1159/000543128. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Predicting Bleeding Related Events in Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Angiomyolipoma: Simplifying Risk Assessment with Tumor Diameter and Depth, A Retrospective Study.预测机器人辅助肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤部分肾切除术出血相关事件:利用肿瘤直径和深度简化风险评估,一项回顾性研究
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 21;20:883-892. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S472180. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of Superselective Renal Artery Embolization versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Ruptured Hemorrhagic Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Single-Center Study.
超选择性肾动脉栓塞术与后腹腔镜下部分肾切除术治疗破裂出血性肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的比较:一项单中心研究
Diseases. 2024 Sep 16;12(9):218. doi: 10.3390/diseases12090218.
4
Management of renal sinus angiomyolipoma: modified robotic nephron-sparing surgery in a single center.肾窦血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的处理:单中心改良机器人肾部分切除术。
BMC Urol. 2024 May 7;24(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01492-x.
5
Does tumor rupture during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy have an impact on mid-term tumor recurrences?机器人辅助部分肾切除术过程中肿瘤破裂是否会影响中期肿瘤复发?
Radiol Oncol. 2023 Jul 20;57(3):348-355. doi: 10.2478/raon-2023-0031. eCollection 2023 Sep 1.
6
Safety and Effectiveness of Medical Therapy and Surgical Intervention for Renal Angiomyolipoma Associated With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤伴结节性硬化症的医学治疗和手术干预的安全性和有效性。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221140266. doi: 10.1177/10732748221140266.
7
Selective arterial embolization of renal angiomyolipomas: A 10-year experience.肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的选择性动脉栓塞:10年经验
BJUI Compass. 2021 Aug 31;3(1):86-92. doi: 10.1002/bco2.107. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Giant Sporadic Renal Angiomyolipomas of ≥7 cm: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗直径≥7厘米的散发性巨大肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤:倾向评分匹配分析
J Oncol. 2021 Aug 26;2021:6395876. doi: 10.1155/2021/6395876. eCollection 2021.
9
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy with sequential clamping of segmental renal arteries for multiple ipsilateral renal tumors: initial outcomes.机器人辅助部分肾切除术伴节段性肾动脉序贯夹闭治疗多发同侧肾肿瘤:初步结果。
BMC Urol. 2019 May 3;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0451-y.
10
Benign Neoplasm of Kidney: Angiomyolipoma.肾良性肿瘤:血管平滑肌脂肪瘤。
J Med Ultrasound. 2018 Jul-Sep;26(3):119-122. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_48_18. Epub 2018 Sep 14.