Suppr超能文献

利拉鲁肽治疗血糖控制不佳的超重 1 型糖尿病成年患者的疗效和安全性(Lira-1):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Efficacy and safety of liraglutide for overweight adult patients with type 1 diabetes and insufficient glycaemic control (Lira-1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Mar;4(3):221-232. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00436-2. Epub 2015 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combination of insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist therapy improves glycaemic control, induces weight loss, and reduces insulin dose needed in type 2 diabetes. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide as an add-on therapy to insulin for overweight adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at Steno Diabetes Center (Gentofte, Denmark). Patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 diabetes, insufficient glycaemic control (HbA1c >8% [64 mmol/mol]), and overweight (BMI >25 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive insulin treatment plus either liraglutide or placebo (saline solution) by subcutaneous injection once per day. Randomisation was done in blocks of four. Treatment assignment was masked to investigators and patients. Treatment lasted 24 weeks and liraglutide was started at a dose of 0·6 mg per day, escalated to 1·2 mg per day after 1 week, and then again to 1·8 mg per day after another week. Intervals between dose increments could be extended at the discretion of the investigator. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints were changes in hypoglycaemic events, glycaemic variability, glycaemic excursions, insulin dose, bodyweight, postprandial plasma concentrations of glucagon and GLP-1, gastric emptying, blood pressure, heart rate, patient-reported outcome measures, time spent in hypoglycaemia, near-normoglycaemia, and hyperglycaemia, plasma fasting glucose, mean glucose, and cholesterol. Efficacy analyses were calculated by use of a mixed model, whereby a patient's data are used as long as the patient is in the study. The safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, which consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of their randomly assigned study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01612468.

FINDINGS

Between July 10, 2012, and May 30, 2014, we enrolled 100 patients with type 1 diabetes, with 50 patients allocated liraglutide and 50 to placebo. Four patients from the liraglutide group and six patients from the placebo group discontinued treatment before 24 weeks. At the end of treatment, change in HbA1c from baseline did not differ between groups (-0·5%, 95% CI -0·8 to -0·4 [-6·0 mmol/mol, 95% CI -8·7 to -4·4] with liraglutide vs -0·3%, -0·6 to -0·2 [-4·0 mmol/mol, -6·6 to -2·3] with placebo; between-group difference -0·2% [-0·5 to 0·1; 2·2 mmol/mol, -5·5 to 1·1], p=0·1833). The number of hypoglycaemic events was reduced with liraglutide, with an incident rate ratio of 0·82 (95% CI 0·74 to 0·90). However, we detected no changes in glycaemic variability (continuous overall net glycaemic action per 60 min from 10·3 [95% CI 9·8 to 10·8] to 9·9 [9·2 to 10·6] in the liraglutide treated patients vs 10·2 [9·7 to 10·7] to 9·7 [9·1 to 10·3] in the placebo treated patients). Both bolus insulin (difference -5·8 IU, 95% CI -10·7 to -0·8, p=0·0227) and bodyweight (difference -6·8 kg, 95% CI -12·2 to -1·4, p=0·0145) decreased with liraglutide treatment compared with placebo. Heart rate increased with liraglutide, with a difference between groups of 7·5 bpm (95% CI 2·8-12·2, p=0·0019). Postprandial plasma glucagon and GLP-1 concentrations did not differ between groups (difference between groups at end of treatment: -408 mmol/L per 240 min [95% CI -941 to 125, p=0·1309] for glucagon and -266 mmol/L per 240 min [-1034 to 501, p=0·4899] for GLP-1). Gastric emptying was delayed after 3 weeks of treatment with liraglutide (19·9 min, 95% CI 0·8 to 39·0, p=0·0412), but we detected no difference after 24 weeks of treatment (-1·5 min, -20·5 to 17·6, p=0·8793). Patient-reported outcome measures differed between groups only with respect to perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia, which was higher with placebo, with a difference between groups of -0·6 (95% CI -1·1 to -0·07, p=0·0257). Liraglutide was associated with more frequent nausea (29 [58%] patients with liraglutide vs five [10%] with placebo), dyspepsia (11 [22%] patients with liraglutide vs one [2%] with placebo), diarrhoea (ten [20%] patients with liraglutide vs one [2%] with placebo), decreased appetite (seven patients [14%] with liraglutide vs none with placebo), and vomiting (seven [14%] patients with liraglutide vs one [2%] with placebo).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with type 1 diabetes, overweight, and insufficient glycaemic control, the reduction in HbA1c did not differ between insulin plus placebo and insulin plus liraglutide treatment. Liraglutide was associated with reductions in hypoglycaemic events, bolus and total insulin dose, and bodyweight, and increased heart rate.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk.

摘要

背景

胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂联合治疗可改善血糖控制,减轻体重,并减少 2 型糖尿病患者所需的胰岛素剂量。我们评估了 GLP-1 受体激动剂利拉鲁肽作为超重的 1 型糖尿病成年患者的胰岛素附加治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们在丹麦 Gentofte 的 Steno 糖尿病中心进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。年龄在 18 岁或以上、血糖控制不佳(HbA1c>8%[64 mmol/mol])且超重(BMI>25 kg/m2)的 1 型糖尿病患者被随机分配(1:1)接受胰岛素治疗加利拉鲁肽或安慰剂(生理盐水)皮下注射,每天一次。随机分组为 4 个块。分配给研究人员和患者的是盲法。治疗持续 24 周,利拉鲁肽起始剂量为 0.6 mg/天,1 周后增加至 1.2 mg/天,再过 1 周后增加至 1.8 mg/天。剂量增加的间隔可根据研究者的判断延长。主要终点是从基线到第 24 周时 HbA1c 的变化。次要终点是低血糖事件、血糖变异性、血糖波动、胰岛素剂量、体重、餐后胰高血糖素和 GLP-1 血浆浓度、胃排空、血压、心率、患者报告的结果测量、低血糖时间、接近正常血糖、高血糖时间、空腹血糖、平均血糖和胆固醇。疗效分析采用混合模型计算,只要患者仍在研究中,就可以使用患者的数据。安全性分析采用意向治疗人群进行,该人群由接受至少一剂随机分配研究药物的所有患者组成。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01612468。

结果

2012 年 7 月 10 日至 2014 年 5 月 30 日期间,我们纳入了 100 名 1 型糖尿病患者,其中 50 名患者接受利拉鲁肽治疗,50 名患者接受安慰剂治疗。利拉鲁肽组中有 4 名患者和安慰剂组中有 6 名患者在 24 周前停止治疗。治疗结束时,与安慰剂相比,胰岛素联合利拉鲁肽治疗组的 HbA1c 从基线的变化无差异(-0.5%,95%CI-0.8 至-0.4[-6.0 mmol/mol,95%CI-8.7 至-4.4]与利拉鲁肽组相比,-0.3%,-0.6 至-0.2[-4.0 mmol/mol,-6.6 至-2.3]与安慰剂;组间差异-0.2%[-0.5 至 0.1;2.2 mmol/mol,-5.5 至 1.1],p=0.1833)。利拉鲁肽可减少低血糖事件,其发生率比为 0.82(95%CI0.74 至 0.90)。然而,我们没有发现血糖变异性有变化(60 分钟内整体净血糖作用每 10.3[95%CI9.8 至 10.6]增加至 9.9[9.2 至 10.6],与安慰剂相比,10.2[9.7 至 10.7]增加至 9.7[9.1 至 10.3])。无论是速效胰岛素(差值-5.8 IU,95%CI-10.7 至-0.8,p=0.0227)还是体重(差值-6.8 kg,95%CI-12.2 至-1.4,p=0.0145)都随着利拉鲁肽治疗而减少与安慰剂相比。利拉鲁肽治疗组的心率增加,组间差异为 7.5 bpm(95%CI2.8-12.2,p=0.0019)。餐后胰高血糖素和 GLP-1 血浆浓度无差异(治疗结束时组间差异:胰高血糖素每 240 分钟减少 408 mmol/L[-941 至 125,p=0.1309],GLP-1 减少 266 mmol/L[-1034 至 501,p=0.4899])。利拉鲁肽治疗 3 周后胃排空延迟(19.9 min,95%CI0.8 至 39.0,p=0.0412),但 24 周后无差异(-1.5 min,-20.5 至 17.6,p=0.8793)。仅在报告的低血糖频率方面,患者报告的结果测量存在差异,与安慰剂相比,这种差异更高,组间差异为-0.6(95%CI-1.1 至-0.07,p=0.0257)。利拉鲁肽更常引起恶心(29[58%]名利拉鲁肽患者与 5[10%]名安慰剂患者相比)、消化不良(11[22%]名利拉鲁肽患者与 1[2%]名安慰剂患者相比)、腹泻(10[20%]名利拉鲁肽患者与 1[2%]名安慰剂患者相比)、食欲下降(7[14%]名利拉鲁肽患者与无安慰剂患者相比)和呕吐(7[14%]名利拉鲁肽患者与 1[2%]名安慰剂患者相比)。

结论

在血糖控制不佳、超重且患有 1 型糖尿病的患者中,与胰岛素加安慰剂相比,胰岛素加利拉鲁肽治疗并未降低 HbA1c。利拉鲁肽可减少低血糖事件、速效和总胰岛素剂量以及体重,并增加心率。

资金来源

Novo Nordisk。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验