Impact of sinuses of Valsalva on prosthesis durability in patients undergoing ascending aorta and aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a propensity score-based study.

OBJECTIVES

The effect of sinuses of Valsalva on aortic bioprosthesis durability has not been investigated so far. The aim of this study was to compare durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic bioprosthesis in patients undergoing aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement as a composite bioconduit (Group A, case group) versus patients undergoing separate replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta, with preservation of the aortic root (Group B, control group), between January 2000 and January 2014.

METHODS

Records of Group A (n = 133) and Group B (n = 162) patients were retrospectively reviewed. End-points were evaluated among groups in three ways: before and after propensity score 1:1 matching (Group A, n = 94; Group B, n = 94 patients) and after patient stratification through quintiles of propensity scores.

RESULTS

There was no difference among groups regarding mean and maximal trans-prosthetic pressure gradients at discharge (P = 0.07 and 0.45, respectively). Maximal trans-prosthetic gradients were lower in Group A patients at last control (P = 0.03). Structural valve deterioration (SVD) was due to prosthesis regurgitation (Group A, n = 5; Group B, n = 1), stenosis (Group A, n = 2; Group B, n = 5) or combined (Group A, n = 4; Group B, n = 2). After a mean follow-up of 68 ± 42 months, there was no difference among groups, at 5 and 12 years, regarding mortality, freedom from SVD, from redo aortic valve replacement for SVD and cardiac redo of any type, before and after matching and after stratification according to quintiles of propensity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the 12-year follow-up, the absence of the sinuses of Valsalva seems to have no influence on durability of Carpentier Edwards aortic bioprosthesis. Longer follow-up may be warranted.