Glauser Tracy, Laurenza Antonio, Yang Haichen, Williams Betsy, Ma Tony, Fain Randi
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Eisai Neuroscience and General Medicine PCU, Eisai Inc., 155 Tice Blvd., Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677, USA.
Epilepsy Res. 2016 Jan;119:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Perampanel is a selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in partial seizures in patients aged ≥ 12 years in Phase III studies. Post-hoc analysis of these studies was conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of perampanel based on the number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at baseline, as well as to examine which baseline characteristics, if any, were predictors of efficacy. Efficacy parameters were based on the number of baseline AEDs, and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of demographic and baseline clinical factors with probability of ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Patients on 1 AED at baseline were significantly more likely to have reduced seizure frequency (P<0.02) and improved 50% responder rate (P<0.02) than patients on 3 AEDs at baseline. Secondarily generalized seizures at baseline, unknown etiology, and use of concomitant non-inducer AEDs were also established as positive predictors of efficacy (50% responder rate; P<0.01). Patients with more AEDs at baseline were associated with greater use of inducers (P<0.01), which may result in decreased exposure of perampanel in these patients and lower efficacy. Patients with 1 AED at baseline had a significantly shorter time since diagnosis compared with patients in the 3 (P<0.01) AEDs group, as well as a lower median seizure frequency at baseline compared to patients on 3 AEDs (P<0.05), suggesting that the reduced efficacy of perampanel with 3 AEDs may also be associated with the greater severity of seizures in the patient groups. The incidence of adverse events in perampanel-treated patients was similar regardless of the number of AEDs at baseline. Greater efficacy is predicted for patients receiving fewer concomitant AEDs when starting perampanel, as well as for those receiving concomitant treatment with AEDs that are not CYP3A4 enzyme-inducers, compared to patients treated with multiple concomitant AEDs. The results of this study provide additional information for clinicians considering adding perampanel to their patients' treatment regimen earlier rather than later, and offer evidence regarding the potential for increased efficacy with a decreased medication burden.
吡仑帕奈是一种选择性、非竞争性的α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)受体拮抗剂,在Ⅲ期研究中已证明对≥12岁患者的部分性癫痫发作有效且耐受性良好。对这些研究进行了事后分析,以根据基线时联用抗癫痫药物(AED)的数量确定吡仑帕奈的疗效和耐受性,并检查哪些基线特征(如果有的话)是疗效的预测因素。疗效参数基于基线AED的数量,并使用逻辑回归分析来评估人口统计学和基线临床因素与癫痫发作频率降低≥50%的概率之间的关联。与基线时使用3种AED的患者相比,基线时使用1种AED的患者癫痫发作频率降低(P<0.02)和50%缓解率提高(P<0.02)的可能性显著更高。基线时的继发性全身性癫痫发作、病因不明以及联用非诱导型AED也被确定为疗效的阳性预测因素(50%缓解率;P<0.01)。基线时使用更多AED的患者与更多使用诱导剂相关(P<0.01),这可能导致这些患者中吡仑帕奈的暴露减少和疗效降低。与使用3种AED的患者组相比,基线时使用1种AED的患者自诊断以来的时间显著更短(P<0.01),且基线时的癫痫发作频率中位数也低于使用3种AED的患者(P<0.05),这表明使用3种AED时吡仑帕奈疗效降低也可能与患者组中癫痫发作的更严重程度有关。无论基线时AED的数量如何,吡仑帕奈治疗患者的不良事件发生率相似。与接受多种联用AED治疗的患者相比,开始使用吡仑帕奈时联用较少AED的患者以及接受非CYP3A4酶诱导剂的AED联用治疗的患者预计疗效更佳。本研究结果为临床医生考虑尽早而非推迟将吡仑帕奈添加到患者治疗方案中提供了更多信息,并提供了关于疗效增加而药物负担降低可能性的证据。