Tiwary Ekta, Hegde Shylaja, Purushotham Sangeetha, Deivanayagam Champion, Srivastava Om
Department of Vision Sciences, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States of America.
Department of Vision Sciences/Centre for Structural Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 11;10(12):e0144621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144621. eCollection 2015.
Interaction among crystallins is required for the maintenance of lens transparency. Deamidation is one of the most common post-translational modifications in crystallins, which results in incorrect interaction and leads to aggregate formation. Various studies have established interaction among the α- and β-crystallins. Here, we investigated the effects of the deamidation of αA- and αB-crystallins on their interaction with βA3-crystallin using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy-fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FLIM-FRET) methods. SPR analysis confirmed adherence of WT αA- and WT αB-crystallins and their deamidated mutants with βA3-crystallin. The deamidated mutants of αA-crystallin (αA N101D and αA N123D) displayed lower adherence propensity for βA3-crystallin relative to the binding affinity shown by WT αA-crystallin. Among αB-crystallin mutants, αB N78D displayed higher adherence propensity whereas αB N146D mutant showed slightly lower binding affinity for βA3-crystallin relative to that shown by WT αB-crystallin. Under the in vivo condition (FLIM-FRET), both αA-deamidated mutants (αA N101D and αA N123D) exhibited strong interaction with βA3-crystallin (32±4% and 36±4% FRET efficiencies, respectively) compared to WT αA-crystallin (18±4%). Similarly, the αB N78D and αB N146D mutants showed strong interaction (36±4% and 22±4% FRET efficiencies, respectively) with βA3-crystallin compared to 18±4% FRET efficiency of WT αB-crystallin. Further, FLIM-FRET analysis of the C-terminal domain (CTE), N-terminal domain (NTD), and core domain (CD) of αA- and αB-crystallins with βA3-crystallin suggested that interaction sites most likely reside in the αA CTE and αB NTD regions, respectively, as these domains showed the highest FRET efficiencies. Overall, results suggest that similar to WT αA- and WTαB-crystallins, the deamidated mutants showed strong interactionfor βA3-crystallin. Variable in vitro and in vivo interactions are most likely due to the mutant's large size oligomers, reduced hydrophobicity, and altered structures. Together, the results suggest that deamidation of α-crystallin may facilitate greater interaction and the formation of large oligomers with other crystallins, and this may contribute to the cataractogenic mechanism.
晶状体蛋白之间的相互作用是维持晶状体透明度所必需的。脱酰胺作用是晶状体蛋白中最常见的翻译后修饰之一,它会导致错误的相互作用并导致聚集体形成。各种研究已经证实了α-晶状体蛋白和β-晶状体蛋白之间的相互作用。在这里,我们使用表面等离子体共振(SPR)和荧光寿命成像显微镜-荧光共振能量转移(FLIM-FRET)方法,研究了αA-和αB-晶状体蛋白脱酰胺对它们与βA3-晶状体蛋白相互作用的影响。SPR分析证实了野生型αA-和野生型αB-晶状体蛋白及其脱酰胺突变体与βA3-晶状体蛋白的结合。相对于野生型αA-晶状体蛋白所显示的结合亲和力,αA-晶状体蛋白的脱酰胺突变体(αA N101D和αA N123D)对βA3-晶状体蛋白的结合倾向较低。在αB-晶状体蛋白突变体中,αB N78D显示出较高的结合倾向,而αB N146D突变体对βA3-晶状体蛋白的结合亲和力相对于野生型αB-晶状体蛋白略低。在体内条件下(FLIM-FRET),与野生型αA-晶状体蛋白(18±4%)相比,两种αA-脱酰胺突变体(αA N101D和αA N123D)均与βA3-晶状体蛋白表现出强烈的相互作用(FRET效率分别为32±4%和36±4%)。同样,与野生型αB-晶状体蛋白18±4%的FRET效率相比,αB N78D和αB N146D突变体与βA3-晶状体蛋白表现出强烈的相互作用(FRET效率分别为36±4%和22±4%)。此外,对αA-和αB-晶状体蛋白的C末端结构域(CTE)、N末端结构域(NTD)和核心结构域(CD)与βA3-晶状体蛋白进行的FLIM-FRET分析表明,相互作用位点最有可能分别位于αA CTE和αB NTD区域,因为这些结构域显示出最高的FRET效率。总体而言,结果表明,与野生型αA-和野生型αB-晶状体蛋白一样,脱酰胺突变体与βA3-晶状体蛋白表现出强烈的相互作用。体外和体内相互作用的差异很可能是由于突变体的大尺寸寡聚体、疏水性降低和结构改变所致。这些结果共同表明,α-晶状体蛋白的脱酰胺作用可能促进与其他晶状体蛋白的更大相互作用和大寡聚体的形成,这可能有助于白内障的发生机制。