Suppr超能文献

常规葡萄糖测定应该使用哪种样本管?

Which sample tube should be used for routine glucose determination?

作者信息

Bonetti Graziella, Cancelli Vanessa, Coccoli Giulio, Piccinelli Giorgio, Brugnoni Duilio, Caimi Luigi, Carta Mariarosa

机构信息

Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, A.O. Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, A.O. Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Prim Care Diabetes. 2016 Jun;10(3):227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glucose is one of the most frequently requested analytes in clinical laboratory. Blood glucose analysis is affected from in vitro glycolysis. In order to determine the most suitable blood collection tube for this purpose we have compared different tubes: sodium fluoride, lithium heparin, sodium fluoride/citrate buffer containing tubes and serum with clot activator tube for the measurement of glucose when the tube has been kept at room temperature (RT) for up to 4h.

METHODS

Venous blood was collected from 49 healthy volunteers into Sarstedt S-Monovettes for glucose analysis. Reference plasma glucose was determined in a lithium heparin tube and immediately placed in an ice/water slurry. Within 10min it was centrifuged at 4°C and plasma was separated from the blood cells. Samples have been preserved at RT for 1, 2 and 4h after drawing. Glucose has been determined using a hexokinase method.

RESULTS

Glucose levels tested in a serum with clot activator tube, in lithium heparin and in sodium fluoride/sodium EDTA tubes when compared with lithium-heparin reference plasma did not meet the desirable bias for glucose (±1.8%) when kept at RT for up to 4h. GlucoEXACT tubes, when corrected by the Sarsted recommended factor of 1.16, showed a mean (95% CI) bias of +0.96% (0.45-1.47) at 1h, +1.40% (0.88-1.93) at 2h and +0.95% (0.44-1.46) at 4h, reaching the analytical goal for the desirable bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Samples collected into GlucoEXACT tubes containing sodium fluoride/citrate buffer liquid mixture are equivalent to those collected in reference plasma tubes avoiding glycolysis completely and within a 4h delay in plasma separation.

摘要

背景

葡萄糖是临床实验室中最常检测的分析物之一。血糖分析会受到体外糖酵解的影响。为了确定最适合此项检测的采血管,我们比较了不同的采血管:氟化钠管、肝素锂管、含氟化钠/柠檬酸盐缓冲液的采血管以及含有促凝剂的血清管,用于在室温下保存长达4小时的血糖检测。

方法

从49名健康志愿者采集静脉血至Sarstedt S-Monovettes采血管中进行葡萄糖分析。在肝素锂管中测定参考血浆葡萄糖,并立即置于冰/水混合液中。10分钟内于4℃离心,分离血浆和血细胞。采血后样本在室温下保存1、2和4小时。使用己糖激酶法测定葡萄糖。

结果

与肝素锂参考血浆相比,含有促凝剂的血清管、肝素锂管和氟化钠/乙二胺四乙酸钠管中检测的葡萄糖水平在室温下保存长达4小时时,未达到葡萄糖的理想偏差(±1.8%)。当按照Sarstedt推荐的1.16系数校正后,GlucoEXACT管在1小时时平均(95%置信区间)偏差为+0.96%(0.45 - 1.47),2小时时为+1.40%(0.88 - 1.93),4小时时为+0.95%(0.44 - 1.46),达到了理想偏差的分析目标。

结论

采集到含有氟化钠/柠檬酸盐缓冲液混合物的GlucoEXACT管中的样本,等同于采集到参考血浆管中的样本,能完全避免糖酵解,且血浆分离延迟4小时内不受影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验