Fukuda David H, Stout Jeffrey R, Moon Jordan R, Smith-Ryan Abbie E, Kendall Kristina L, Hoffman Jay R
Institute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Institute of Exercise Physiology & Wellness, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Exp Gerontol. 2016 Feb;74:9-12. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
Raw bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) data [resistance (R); reactance (Xc)] through bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) and phase angle (PhA) have been used to evaluate cellular function and hydration status. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of resistance training (RT) on classic and specific BIVA in elderly women. Twenty women (mean ± SD; age: 71.9 ± 6.9 years; BMI: 24.5 ± 3.0 kg m(-2)) completed a 6-month RT program. Whole-body, single-frequency BIA, body geometry, and leg strength (5RM) measures were completed at baseline (t0), 3 months (t3), and 6 months (t6). The mean impedance vector displacements were compared using Hotelling's T(2) test to evaluate changes in R and Xc relative to height (R/ht; Xc/ht) or body volume (Rsp; Xcsp) estimated from the arms, legs, and trunk. 5RM, PhA, and BIVA variables were compared using ANOVA. PhA improved at t6 (p < 0.01), while 5RM improved at t3 and t6 (p < 0.01). Using classic BIVA, 6 months (T(2) = 31.6; p < 0.01), but not 3 months of RT (T(2) = 4.5; p = 0.20), resulted in significant vector migration. Using specific BIVA, 6 months (T(2) = 24.4; p < 0.01), but not 3 months of RT (T(2) = 5.5; p = 0.10), also resulted in significant vector migration. 5RM was correlated to both PhA (r = 0.48-56) and Xcsp (r = 0.45-53) at all time points. Vector displacements were likely the result of improved cellular integrity (Xcsp) and cellular health (PhA).
通过生物电阻抗矢量分析(BIVA)得出的原始生物电阻抗分析(BIA)数据[电阻(R);电抗(Xc)]和相角(PhA)已被用于评估细胞功能和水合状态。本研究的目的是检验阻力训练(RT)对老年女性经典和特定BIVA的影响。20名女性(平均±标准差;年龄:71.9±6.9岁;体重指数:24.5±3.0 kg m⁻²)完成了为期6个月的RT计划。在基线(t0)、3个月(t3)和6个月(t6)时完成全身单频BIA、身体几何形状和腿部力量(5RM)测量。使用霍特林T²检验比较平均阻抗矢量位移,以评估R和Xc相对于根据手臂、腿部和躯干估计的身高(R/ht;Xc/ht)或身体体积(Rsp;Xcsp)的变化。使用方差分析比较5RM、PhA和BIVA变量。PhA在t6时有所改善(p<0.01),而5RM在t3和t6时有所改善(p<0.01)。使用经典BIVA,6个月(T²=31.6;p<0.01),但不是3个月的RT(T²=4.5;p=0.20)导致显著的矢量迁移。使用特定BIVA,6个月(T²=24.4;p<0.01),但不是3个月的RT(T²=5.5;p=0.10)也导致显著的矢量迁移。在所有时间点,5RM与PhA(r=0.48 - 56)和Xcsp(r=0.45 - 53)均相关。矢量位移可能是细胞完整性(Xcsp)和细胞健康(PhA)改善的结果。