Kim Sunny Jung, Marsch Lisa A, Acosta Michelle C, Guarino Honoria, Aponte-Melendez Yesenia
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, 85 Mechanic Street, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., 71 W. 23rd St., New York, NY 10010, USA.
Addict Behav. 2016 Mar;54:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
A growing line of research has shown positive treatment outcomes from technology-based therapy for substance use disorders (SUDs). However, little is known about the effectiveness of technology-based SUD interventions for persons who already had numerous prior SUD treatments. We conducted a secondary analysis on a 12-month trial with patients (N=160) entering methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Patients were randomly assigned to either standard MMT treatment or a model in which half of standard counseling sessions were replaced with a computer-based intervention, called Therapeutic Education System (standard+TES). Four treatment history factors at baseline, the number of lifetime SUD treatment episodes, detoxification episodes, and inpatient/outpatient treatment episodes were categorized into three levels based on their tertile points, and analyzed as moderators. Dependent variables were urine toxicology results for opioid and cocaine abstinence for 52-weeks. The standard+TES condition produced significantly better opioid abstinence than standard treatment for participants with 1) a moderate or high frequency of lifetime SUD treatment episodes, and 2) those with all three levels (low, moderate and high) of detoxification and inpatient/outpatient treatment episodes, ps<.01. The standard+TES condition enhanced cocaine abstinence compared to standard treatment among people with 1) a moderate or high frequency of lifetime SUD treatment episodes, 2) a high level of detoxification episodes, and 3) a moderate or high level of inpatient treatment history, ps<.01. We found that including technology-based behavioral therapy as part of treatment can be more effective than MMT alone, even among patients with a history of multiple addiction treatment episodes.
越来越多的研究表明,基于技术的物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗能产生积极的治疗效果。然而,对于已经接受过多次SUD治疗的人来说,基于技术的SUD干预措施的有效性却知之甚少。我们对一项为期12个月的试验进行了二次分析,该试验的患者(N = 160)进入美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)。患者被随机分配到标准MMT治疗组或一种模式,即一半的标准咨询疗程被一种名为治疗教育系统(标准 + TES)的计算机化干预所取代。将基线时的四个治疗史因素,即终生SUD治疗次数、戒毒次数以及住院/门诊治疗次数,根据其三分位数点分为三个水平,并作为调节变量进行分析。因变量是52周内阿片类药物和可卡因戒断的尿液毒理学结果。对于以下参与者,标准 + TES模式产生的阿片类药物戒断效果显著优于标准治疗:1)终生SUD治疗次数为中度或高频;2)戒毒以及住院/门诊治疗次数处于所有三个水平(低、中、高)的参与者,p <.01。与标准治疗相比,标准 + TES模式在以下人群中增强了可卡因戒断效果:1)终生SUD治疗次数为中度或高频;2)戒毒次数较高;3)住院治疗史为中度或高度的人群,p <.01。我们发现,将基于技术的行为疗法纳入治疗的一部分,甚至在有多次成瘾治疗史的患者中,可能比单独的MMT更有效。