Bar Raphael
BR Consulting, Rehovot, Israel 76247; email:
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2015 Nov-Dec;69(6):743-61. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.01079.
Statistical tools are required to organize and present microbial environmental monitoring data for the purpose of evaluating it against regulatory action limits and of determining if the microbial monitoring process is in a state of control. This paper applies a known methodology of a simple and straightforward construction of control XmR (X data and moving range) charts of individual microbial counts as they are or of contamination rates derived from them, irrespective of the type of the parent data distribution and without the need to transform the data into a normal distribution. Plotting of monthly and cumulative sample contamination rates, as newly suggested by USP <1116>, is also shown. Both types of the control charts and plots allow an evaluation of the behavior of the microbial monitoring process. After addressing the magnitude of microbial counts expected in environmental monitoring samples, this paper presents the rationale behind the use of XmR charts. Employing data taken from environmental monitoring programs of pharmaceuticals manufacturing facilities, this paper analyzes examples of (1) microbial counts from passive or active air sampling in area Grade D or B or Class 100,000 in XmR charts, (2) contamination recovery rates as suggested by USP <1116> from active air samples in area Grade B and contact plates in area Grade C, and (3) instantaneous contamination rates with calculations illustrated on microbial counts of contact plates in area Grade D.
Pharmaceutical companies conduct environmental monitoring programs, and samples of air (active and passive sampling) and of surfaces (contact plates) are routinely tested for microbiological quality. Thus, hundreds of microbial counts of tested environmental monitoring samples are routinely generated and recorded. Statistical tools are required to organize and present this abundant data for the purpose of evaluating it against regulatory action limits and determining if the microbial monitoring process is a state of control. This paper has a two-fold purpose. The first purpose is to provide microbiologists and quality assurance personnel simple and straightforward tools of statistical process control for evaluating the behavior of the microbial monitoring process: individual XmR (X data and moving range) control charts of microbial counts as they are or of rates derived from them are constructed irrespective of the type of the parent data distribution and without the need to transform the data into a normal distribution. Plotting of monthly and cumulative sample contamination rates, as newly suggested by USP <1116>, is also shown. The second purpose is to present examples of the charting of (1) microbial counts, (2) contamination recovery rates as suggested by USP <1116>, and (3) instantaneous contamination rates using data taken from environmental monitoring programs of pharmaceuticals manufacturing facilities.
需要运用统计工具来整理和呈现微生物环境监测数据,以便对照监管行动限度对其进行评估,并确定微生物监测过程是否处于受控状态。本文应用了一种已知方法,可简单直接地构建单个微生物计数或由其得出的污染率的控制XmR(X数据和移动极差)图,而无需考虑原始数据分布的类型,也无需将数据转换为正态分布。本文还展示了按照美国药典<1116>新建议绘制的月度和累积样品污染率图。这两种控制图和图都可用于评估微生物监测过程的行为。在讨论了环境监测样品中预期的微生物计数数量之后,本文阐述了使用XmR图的基本原理。本文利用制药生产设施环境监测项目的数据,分析了以下示例:(1)在XmR图中D级或B级区域或100,000级洁净区进行的被动或主动空气采样中的微生物计数;(2)美国药典<1116>建议的B级区域主动空气样品和C级区域接触碟的污染回收率;(3)D级区域接触碟微生物计数所说明的瞬时污染率计算。
制药公司开展环境监测项目,对空气(主动和被动采样)和表面(接触碟)样品的微生物质量进行常规检测。因此,常规会生成并记录数百个经检测的环境监测样品的微生物计数。需要运用统计工具来整理和呈现这些丰富的数据,以便对照监管行动限度对其进行评估,并确定微生物监测过程是否处于受控状态。本文有两个目的。第一个目的是为微生物学家和质量保证人员提供统计过程控制的简单直接工具,用于评估微生物监测过程的行为:构建单个微生物计数或由其得出的比率的XmR(X数据和移动极差)控制图,无需考虑原始数据分布的类型,也无需将数据转换为正态分布。本文还展示了按照美国药典<1116>新建议绘制的月度和累积样品污染率图。第二个目的是展示使用制药生产设施环境监测项目数据绘制以下图表的示例:(1)微生物计数;(2)美国药典<1116>建议的污染回收率;(3)瞬时污染率。