Viswabandya Auro, Devlin Rebecca, Gupta Vikas
Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
The Elizabeth and Tony Comper MPN Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016 Feb;11(1):6-11. doi: 10.1007/s11899-015-0296-8.
Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor therapy is effective in alleviating myelofibrosis (MF)-related symptoms. However, at present, the only curative therapy for MF patients is hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The decision of whether to proceed with HCT, which carries significant risks, or continue with JAK inhibitor therapy is a complicated one. Nevertheless, careful assessment of patient, disease, and transplant-related factors can guide this decision on a case-by-case basis. Difficult questions arise in the decision-making process such as age limits, whether lower-risk patients are suitable candidates, and HCT in patients responding well to JAK inhibitor therapy. The optimal timing of transplant is a major dilemma in the management of MF patients who are responding to or are stable on JAK inhibitor therapy. In this paper, we provide our perspective on selection of transplant versus non-transplant therapies in the management of MF.
Janus激酶1/2(JAK1/2)抑制剂疗法在缓解骨髓纤维化(MF)相关症状方面有效。然而,目前,MF患者唯一的治愈性疗法是造血细胞移植(HCT)。决定是进行有重大风险的HCT还是继续使用JAK抑制剂疗法是一个复杂的问题。尽管如此,对患者、疾病和移植相关因素进行仔细评估可以逐案指导这一决定。在决策过程中会出现一些难题,如年龄限制、低风险患者是否是合适的候选者以及对JAK抑制剂疗法反应良好的患者进行HCT等问题。对于在JAK抑制剂疗法下有反应或病情稳定的MF患者,移植的最佳时机是管理中的一个主要困境。在本文中,我们就MF管理中移植与非移植疗法的选择提供我们的观点。