顺势疗法薄弱伦理辩护的有力补救措施。
A Strong Remedy to a Weak Ethical Defence of Homeopathy.
作者信息
Shaw David
机构信息
Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
出版信息
J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Dec;12(4):549-53. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9674-0. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
PMID:26659862
Abstract
In this article, I indicate and illustrate several flaws in a recent "ethical defence" of homeopathy. It transpires that the authors' arguments have several features in common with homeopathic remedies, including strong claims, a lack of logic or evidence, and no actual effect.
摘要
在本文中，我指出并阐述了最近一篇顺势疗法“伦理辩护”中的几个缺陷。结果发现，作者的论点与顺势疗法药物有几个共同特征，包括夸大的主张、缺乏逻辑或证据，以及没有实际效果。
Zotero 插件