Dimopoulos Meletios A, Cheung Matthew C, Roussel Murielle, Liu Ting, Gamberi Barbara, Kolb Brigitte, Derigs H Guenter, Eom HyeonSeok, Belhadj Karim, Lenain Pascal, Van der Jagt Richard, Rigaudeau Sophie, Dib Mamoun, Hall Rachel, Jardel Henry, Jaccard Arnaud, Tosikyan Axel, Karlin Lionel, Bensinger William, Schots Rik, Leupin Nicolas, Chen Guang, Marek Jennifer, Ervin-Haynes Annette, Facon Thierry
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Haematologica. 2016 Mar;101(3):363-70. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.133629. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
Renal impairment is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma. This analysis of the pivotal phase 3 FIRST trial examined the impact of renally adapted dosing of lenalidomide and dexamethasone on outcomes of patients with different degrees of renal impairment. Transplant-ineligible patients not requiring dialysis were randomized 1:1:1 to receive continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone until disease progression (n=535) or for 18 cycles (72 weeks; n=541), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide for 12 cycles (72 weeks; n=547). Follow-up is ongoing. Patients were grouped by baseline creatinine clearance into no (≥ 80 mL/min [n=389]), mild (≥ 50 to < 80 mL/min [n=715]), moderate (≥ 30 to < 50 mL/min [n=372]), and severe impairment (< 30 mL/min [n=147]) subgroups. Continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy reduced the risk of progression or death in no, mild, and moderate renal impairment subgroups vs. melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide therapy (HR = 0.67, 0.70, and 0.65, respectively). Overall survival benefits were observed with continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment vs. melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide treatment in no or mild renal impairment subgroups. Renal function improved from baseline in 52.6% of lenalidomide and dexamethasone-treated patients. The safety profile of continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone was consistent across renal subgroups, except for grade 3/4 anemia and rash, which increased with increasing severity of renal impairment. Continuous lenalidomide and dexamethasone treatment, with renally adapted lenalidomide dosing, was effective for most transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma and renal impairment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00689936); EudraCT (2007-004823-39). Funding: Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome and the Celgene Corporation.
肾功能损害与骨髓瘤的不良预后相关。这项对关键的3期FIRST试验的分析,研究了来那度胺和地塞米松根据肾功能调整剂量对不同程度肾功能损害患者预后的影响。不符合移植条件且不需要透析的患者按1:1:1随机分组,分别接受持续的来那度胺和地塞米松治疗直至疾病进展(n = 535)或治疗18个周期(72周;n = 541),或接受美法仑、泼尼松和沙利度胺治疗12个周期(72周;n = 547)。随访正在进行中。患者根据基线肌酐清除率分为无肾功能损害(≥80 mL/分钟 [n = 389])、轻度肾功能损害(≥50至<80 mL/分钟 [n = 715])、中度肾功能损害(≥30至<50 mL/分钟 [n = 372])和重度肾功能损害(<30 mL/分钟 [n = 147])亚组。与美法仑、泼尼松和沙利度胺治疗相比,持续的来那度胺和地塞米松治疗降低了无、轻度和中度肾功能损害亚组疾病进展或死亡的风险(风险比分别为0.67、0.70和0.65)。在无或轻度肾功能损害亚组中,与美法仑、泼尼松和沙利度胺治疗相比,持续的来那度胺和地塞米松治疗观察到总生存获益。在接受来那度胺和地塞米松治疗的患者中,52.6%的患者肾功能较基线有所改善。除3/4级贫血和皮疹随肾功能损害严重程度增加外,持续的来那度胺和地塞米松的安全性在各肾功能亚组中是一致的。来那度胺根据肾功能调整剂量并持续进行来那度胺和地塞米松治疗,对大多数不符合移植条件的骨髓瘤和肾功能损害患者有效。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT00689936);EudraCT(2007 - 004823 - 39)。资助:法语国家骨髓瘤研究组和新基公司。