Birch P D, Cook J V, Fletcher C J, Walsh M T
General Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Clin Radiol. 1989 May;40(3):262-3. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(89)80192-8.
The pattern of use of the oral cholecystogram and ultrasonocholecystography in the investigation of 1014 patients prior to cholecystectomy was analysed. Three hundred and sixty-eight (36.3%) of our patients had both an oral cholecystogram and an ultrasound examination of the gallbladder. In 193 (52.4%) of these the initial investigation was positive: the second test in this group was rarely helpful and sometimes confusing. Overall the predictive value of a positive first study was 98.5%. We conclude that the use of further investigation following an initially positive result is not justified. By these criteria 18.5% of patients had an unnecessary second investigation.
分析了1014例胆囊切除术患者术前口服胆囊造影和超声胆囊造影的使用模式。我们的患者中有368例(36.3%)既进行了口服胆囊造影又进行了胆囊超声检查。其中193例(52.4%)的初始检查结果为阳性:该组中的第二次检查很少有帮助,有时还会造成混淆。总体而言,首次检查结果为阳性的预测价值为98.5%。我们得出结论,在初始结果为阳性后进行进一步检查是不合理的。根据这些标准,18.5%的患者接受了不必要的第二次检查。