Suppr超能文献

临床高危精神病个体的各种神经认知缺陷及转化风险。

Various neurocognitive deficits and conversion risk in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.

作者信息

Mourik Kees, Decrescenzo Paula, Brucato Gary, Gill Kelly E, Arndt Leigh, Kimhy David, Keilp John G, Girgis Ragy R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;11(3):250-254. doi: 10.1111/eip.12296. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

Abstract

AIM

Individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) exhibit neurocognitive deficits in multiple domains. The aim of this study is to investigate whether several components of neurocognition are predictive of conversion to psychosis.

METHODS

Fifty-two CHR individuals were assessed with the Structured Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes and completed a battery of neurocognitive tests at baseline including measures of executive functioning, attention, working memory, processing speed and reaction time. Neurocognitive functioning at baseline was scored based on an external normative control group. Most subjects were followed for 2.5 years to determine conversion status.

RESULTS

Significant differences in neurocognitive functioning between CHR individuals and the control group were present in all domains. Twenty-six per cent of the participants converted to psychosis within 9.8 (standard deviation = 8.0) months on average (median 9 months), but there were no significant differences in neurocognition converters and non-converters.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals at CHR have deficits in neurocognitive functioning, but such deficits do not appear to be related to conversion risk.

摘要

目的

临床高危精神病个体(CHR)在多个领域存在神经认知缺陷。本研究旨在调查神经认知的几个组成部分是否可预测向精神病的转化。

方法

对52名CHR个体进行了精神病风险综合征结构化访谈评估,并在基线时完成了一系列神经认知测试,包括执行功能、注意力、工作记忆、处理速度和反应时间的测量。基于外部标准化对照组对基线时的神经认知功能进行评分。大多数受试者随访2.5年以确定转化状态。

结果

CHR个体与对照组在所有领域的神经认知功能均存在显著差异。26%的参与者平均在9.8(标准差=8.0)个月内(中位数9个月)转化为精神病,但神经认知转化者和未转化者之间无显著差异。

结论

CHR个体存在神经认知功能缺陷,但这些缺陷似乎与转化风险无关。

相似文献

1
Various neurocognitive deficits and conversion risk in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;11(3):250-254. doi: 10.1111/eip.12296. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
3
Can cognitive deficits facilitate differential diagnosis between at-risk mental state for psychosis and depressive disorders?
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;7(4):381-90. doi: 10.1111/eip.12004. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
4
Neurocognitive function as a possible marker for remission from clinical high risk for psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2014 Mar;153(1-3):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
5
Neurocognitive impairments in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Who will really convert?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 May;49(5):462-70. doi: 10.1177/0004867414561527. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
6
Neurocognitive functioning of subjects with putative pre-psychotic states and early psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2015 May;164(1-3):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
7
Faux pas recognition performance in a help-seeking population at clinical high risk of psychosis.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb;266(1):71-8. doi: 10.1007/s00406-015-0615-z. Epub 2015 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of premorbid cognitive functioning and its timing of onset in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2022 Mar 1;28:100246. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2022.100246. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Predictors of Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Apr 29;21(6):39. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1027-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of cognitive functioning in the outcome of those at clinical high risk for developing psychosis.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Dec;21(4):335-42. doi: 10.1017/S204579601200042X.
2
The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;70(1):107-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.269.
3
Neuropsychological function and suicidal behavior: attention control, memory and executive dysfunction in suicide attempt.
Psychol Med. 2013 Mar;43(3):539-51. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712001419. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
4
Cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis: a meta-analysis.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;69(6):562-71. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1592.
5
Neurocognition in the psychosis risk syndrome: a quantitative and qualitative review.
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(4):399-415. doi: 10.2174/138161212799316019.
6
Impact of neurocognition on social and role functioning in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;168(8):806-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10081209. Epub 2011 May 2.
8
Neurocognitive indicators of clinical high-risk states for psychosis: a critical review of the evidence.
Neurotox Res. 2010 Nov;18(3-4):272-86. doi: 10.1007/s12640-010-9191-1. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
10
Neurocognitive deficits in the (putative) prodrome and first episode of psychosis.
Schizophr Res. 2007 Jul;93(1-3):266-77. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.013. Epub 2007 Apr 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验