• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本肿瘤学家对创新癌症治疗的健康经济学观点。

Perspectives of Japanese oncologists on the health economics of innovative cancer treatments.

作者信息

Takura Tomoyuki, Fujiya Mikihiro, Shimada Yasuhiro, Kohgo Yutaka

机构信息

Department of Health Care Economics and Industrial Policy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;21(4):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0932-2. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10147-015-0932-2
PMID:26667481
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few reports have thus far discussed the influence of economic factors on treatment decision-making by patients. The objective of the present study was to clarify the awareness among oncologists of health economics in cancer treatment.

METHODS

The present study was based on the questionnaire regarding health economics in cancer treatment carried out by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) in July 2013. The subjects were trustees registered with JSCO. The survey investigated the influence of medical expenses on patient access to and selection of medical treatment in order to clarify the primary attributes of the respondents and their awareness of economics. The study also investigated the maximum allowable public medical expenses to prolong the life expectancy of a cancer patient by 1 year and the factors that can influence treatment selection.

RESULTS

The 172 respondents had completed a mean of 30.3 ± 6.2 postgraduate years, and the mean number of patients they treated annually was 1323 ± 1963. The degree of treatment accessibility among patients was perceived positively by 112 (71.3 %) and negatively by 49 (28.7 %) of the respondents, irrespective of medical expenses. Of the 172 respondents, 66 (41.0 %) believed that the maximum allowable medical expenses for cancer treatment should be ≤4 million yen/LY, with 62 (39.8 %) reporting a value of 4.01-8 million yen/LY.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that a certain range of medical expenses has come to be regarded as the standard range of medical expenses for cancer treatment among oncologists, with answers based on the premise that patients should have access to effective medical treatment.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,很少有报告讨论经济因素对患者治疗决策的影响。本研究的目的是明确肿瘤学家对癌症治疗中卫生经济学的认识。

方法

本研究基于日本临床肿瘤学会(JSCO)于2013年7月进行的关于癌症治疗中卫生经济学的问卷调查。研究对象为在JSCO注册的受托人。该调查研究了医疗费用对患者获得和选择治疗的影响,以明确受访者的主要特征及其经济学意识。该研究还调查了将癌症患者预期寿命延长1年的最高可允许公共医疗费用以及可能影响治疗选择的因素。

结果

172名受访者的研究生学历平均为30.3±6.2年,他们每年平均治疗的患者数量为1323±1963名。无论医疗费用如何,112名(71.3%)受访者对患者获得治疗的程度持积极看法,49名(28.7%)持消极看法。在172名受访者中,66名(41.0%)认为癌症治疗的最高可允许医疗费用应≤400万日元/生命年,62名(39.8%)报告的数值为401 - 800万日元/生命年。

结论

本研究结果表明,在肿瘤学家中,一定范围的医疗费用已被视为癌症治疗的医疗费用标准范围,其答案基于患者应能获得有效治疗这一前提。

相似文献

1
Perspectives of Japanese oncologists on the health economics of innovative cancer treatments.日本肿瘤学家对创新癌症治疗的健康经济学观点。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;21(4):633-641. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0932-2. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
2
Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs offer good value?肿瘤学家认为新型抗癌药物具有良好的价值吗?
Oncologist. 2006 Feb;11(2):90-5. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-2-90.
3
Attitude of Iranian Medical Oncologists Toward Economic Aspects, and Policy-making in Relation to New Cancer Drugs.伊朗肿瘤内科医生对新癌症药物经济方面及政策制定的态度。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Oct 20;5(2):99-105. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.186.
4
Oncologists' Views on Using Value to Guide Cancer Treatment Decisions.肿瘤学家对使用价值来指导癌症治疗决策的看法。
Value Health. 2018 Aug;21(8):931-937. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
5
The Role of Physicians in Rationing Cancer Care. Attitudes of German Oncologists.医生在癌症护理配给中的角色。德国肿瘤学家的态度。
Oncol Res Treat. 2017;40(9):490-494. doi: 10.1159/000475759. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
6
Attitudes Toward Family Involvement in Cancer Treatment Decision Making: The Perspectives of Patients, Family Caregivers, and Their Oncologists.对家庭参与癌症治疗决策的态度:患者、家庭照顾者及其肿瘤学家的观点。
Psychooncology. 2017 Jun;26(6):770-778. doi: 10.1002/pon.4226. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
Physician preferences and knowledge regarding the care of childhood cancer survivors in Japan: a mailed survey of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Oncology.日本儿科肿瘤学会对儿科肿瘤幸存者照护的医师偏好和认知的调查:邮寄问卷调查
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun;42(6):513-21. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys038. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
Awareness and behavior of oncologists and support measures in medical institutions related to ongoing employment of cancer patients in Japan.日本医疗机构中肿瘤医生的意识与行为及对在职癌症患者的支持措施。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr;42(4):295-301. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr202. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
9
Oncologists' and physiatrists' attitudes regarding rehabilitation for patients with advanced cancer.肿瘤学家和物理治疗师对晚期癌症患者康复的态度。
PM R. 2012 Feb;4(2):96-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.08.539.
10
Perceived Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Families in the Ambulatory Setting: A Multicenter Survey of Oncologists.门诊环境中与晚期癌症患者及其家属进行照护目标讨论的认知障碍:肿瘤学家的多中心调查
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):125-142. doi: 10.1177/0825859718762287. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.碳离子放射治疗与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的成本效益比较
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;9(4):101441. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101441. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Cancer treatment-related financial toxicity in Japan: a scoping review.日本癌症治疗相关的经济毒性:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 1;14:1205016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1205016. eCollection 2023.
3
Cost-effectiveness of carbon-ion radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical oncologists' perceptions of financial incentives in cancer care.肿瘤内科医生对癌症治疗中财务激励的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):530-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.6063. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
2
How long and how well: oncologists' attitudes toward the relative value of life-prolonging v. quality of life-enhancing treatments.持续时间和效果如何:肿瘤学家对延长生命和提高生活质量治疗的相对价值的态度。
Med Decis Making. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):380-5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10385847. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
3
Understanding how out-of-pocket expenses, treatment value, and patient characteristics influence treatment choices.
碳离子放疗与立体定向体部放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Cancer Sci. 2022 Feb;113(2):674-683. doi: 10.1111/cas.15216. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
了解自付费用、治疗价值和患者特征如何影响治疗选择。
Oncologist. 2010;15(6):566-76. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0307. Epub 2010 May 23.
4
Cancer therapy costs influence treatment: a national survey of oncologists.癌症治疗费用影响治疗:一项对肿瘤学家的全国性调查。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):196-202. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0077.
5
Lapatinib for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.拉帕替尼治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2 过表达乳腺癌。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13 Suppl 3:1-6. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/01.
6
Trastuzumab for the treatment of primary breast cancer in HER2-positive women: a single technology appraisal.曲妥珠单抗用于治疗HER2阳性女性原发性乳腺癌:单项技术评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13 Suppl 1:1-6. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl1/01.
7
Access to high-tech health care. Ethics.
Cancer. 1991 Mar 15;67(6 Suppl):1750-2. doi: 10.1002/cncr.2820671810.