• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全层下睑缺损的单层与双层闭合技术:一项比较研究。

A single- versus double-layered closure technique for full-thickness lower eyelid defects: a comparative study.

作者信息

Verhoekx Jennifer S N, Soebhag Renoe K, Weijtens Olga, van den Bosch Willem A, Paridaens Dion

机构信息

The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 May;94(3):257-60. doi: 10.1111/aos.12927. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1111/aos.12927
PMID:26670482
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare a simplified, single-layered closure technique with a double-layered closure technique in lower eyelid reconstruction following full-thickness pentagonal block excision.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, non-randomized, interventional case-control study. Clinical data of consecutive patients treated with primary closure of a full-thickness lower eyelid defect between 2011 and 2014 were analysed. In group A, the defect was closed in one layer, using non-absorbable polypropylene sutures. In group B, the defect was closed in two layers, using absorbable polyglactin acid sutures. In both techniques, we rarely used a grey line suture to adjust the eyelid margin. We assessed notching, wound dehiscence and other complications, as reported at 2 months after surgery.

RESULTS

We included 188 eyelids from 186 patients. In group A, we included 82 eyelids and in group B 106 eyelids. We noted no difference in notching (p = 0.96) whilst wound dehiscence had not occurred in either group. Subcutaneous granuloma formation had been noted in 0 cases in group A, versus 4 in group B (p = 0.08). Mild redness of the scar was seen in 2 cases in group A, versus 5 in group B (p = 0.41). A grey line suture was placed in 6 cases in group A (7.3%), versus 4 cases in group B (3.8%; p = 0.28).

CONCLUSION

Both single- and double-layered closure techniques are safe and effective methods for primary closure of full-thickness lower eyelid defects. In both techniques, a grey line suture was rarely required to adjust the eyelid margin.

摘要

目的

比较在全层五边形块状切除术后下睑重建中简化的单层缝合技术与双层缝合技术。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性、非随机、干预性病例对照研究。分析了2011年至2014年间接受全层下睑缺损一期缝合治疗的连续患者的临床资料。A组采用不可吸收聚丙烯缝线单层缝合缺损;B组采用可吸收聚乙醇酸缝线双层缝合缺损。两种技术中,我们很少使用灰线缝合来调整睑缘。我们评估了术后2个月报告的切迹、伤口裂开及其他并发症。

结果

我们纳入了186例患者的188只眼睑。A组纳入82只眼睑,B组纳入106只眼睑。我们注意到两组在切迹方面无差异(p = 0.96),且两组均未发生伤口裂开。A组皮下肉芽肿形成0例,B组4例(p = 0.08)。A组2例出现瘢痕轻度发红,B组5例(p = 0.41)。A组6例(7.3%)放置了灰线缝合,B组4例(3.8%;p = 0.28)。

结论

单层和双层缝合技术都是全层下睑缺损一期缝合的安全有效方法。两种技术中,很少需要灰线缝合来调整睑缘。

相似文献

1
A single- versus double-layered closure technique for full-thickness lower eyelid defects: a comparative study.全层下睑缺损的单层与双层闭合技术:一项比较研究。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 May;94(3):257-60. doi: 10.1111/aos.12927. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
2
Diagonal tarsal suture technique sine marginal sutures for closure of full-thickness eyelid defects.经皮三角皮瓣技术无需边缘缝合线即可关闭全层眼睑缺损。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-8. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31827f5ab4.
3
The buried vertical mattress: a simplified technique for eyelid margin repair.埋没垂直褥式缝合:一种简化的睑缘修复技术。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul;19(4):323-4. doi: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000075013.85905.9B.
4
Re: "Diagonal tarsal suture technique sine marginal sutures for closure of full-thickness eyelid defects".回复:“用于全层眼睑缺损闭合的无边缘缝合对角睑板缝合技术”。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(6):505. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000438343.81051.a5.
5
Reply re: "Diagonal tarsal suture technique sine marginal sutures for closure of full-thickness eyelid defects".关于“用于全层眼睑缺损闭合的无边缘缝线的对角跗骨缝合技术”的回复
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(6):505. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000032.
6
Repair of marginal eyelid defects with 7-0 chromic sutures.用7-0铬制缝线修复睑缘缺损
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jul-Aug;22(4):256-8. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000225469.40992.31.
7
A technique for eyelid margin repair without use of marginal sutures.一种无需使用边缘缝线的眼睑缘修复技术。
Orbit. 2021 Jun;40(3):243-246. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1769685. Epub 2020 May 24.
8
A comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesives versus conventional suture materials for eyelid wound closure in rabbits.2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯粘合剂与传统缝合材料用于兔眼睑伤口闭合的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;25(2):121-7. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.2.121. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
9
Techniques in eyelid wound closure.眼睑伤口闭合技术。
Ophthalmic Surg. 1982 Apr;13(4):283-7.
10
"Sandwich block" for eyelid reconstruction.用于眼睑重建的“三明治块”
Orbit. 2010 Apr;29(2):110-3. doi: 10.3109/01676830903556476.