Suppr超能文献

对开壳体系激发态的 TD-DFT 方法的关键性评估:I. 双重态-双重态跃迁。

Critical Assessment of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: I. Doublet-Doublet Transitions.

机构信息

Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, and Center for Computational Science and Engineering, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Chem Theory Comput. 2016 Jan 12;12(1):238-60. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01158. Epub 2015 Dec 31.

Abstract

A benchmark set of 11 small radicals is set up to assess the performance of time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) for the excited states of open-shell systems. Both the unrestricted (U-TD-DFT) and spin-adapted (X-TD-DFT) formulations of TD-DFT are considered. For comparison, the well-established EOM-CCSD (equation-of-motion coupled-cluster with singles and doubles) is also used. In total, 111 low-lying singly excited doublet states are accessed by all the three approaches. Taking the MRCISD+Q (multireference configuration interaction with singles and doubles plus the Davidson correction) results as the benchmark, it is found that both U-TD-DFT and EOM-CCSD perform well for those states dominated by singlet-coupled single excitations (SCSE) from closed-shell to open-shell, open-shell to vacant-shell, or closed-shell to vacant-shell orbitals. However, for those states dominated by triplet-coupled single excitations (TCSE) from closed-shell to vacant-shell orbitals, both U-TD-DFT and EOM-CCSD fail miserably due to severe spin contaminations. In contrast, X-TD-DFT provides balanced descriptions of both SCSE and TCSE. As far as the functional dependence is concerned, it is found that, when the Hartree-Fock ground state does not suffer from the instability problem, both global hybrid (GH) and range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals perform grossly better than pure density functionals, especially for Rydberg and charge-transfer excitations. However, if the Hartree-Fock ground state is instable or nearly instable, GH and RSH tend to underestimate severely the excitation energies. The SAOP (statistically averaging of model orbital potentials) performs more uniformly than any other density functionals, although it generally overestimates the excitation energies of valence excitations. Not surprisingly, both EOM-CCSD and adiabatic TD-DFT are incapable of describing excited states with substantial double excitation characters.

摘要

建立了一个由 11 个小自由基组成的基准集,以评估含时密度泛函理论(TD-DFT)在开壳体系激发态的性能。考虑了无限制(U-TD-DFT)和自旋自适应(X-TD-DFT)形式的 TD-DFT。为了进行比较,还使用了成熟的 EOM-CCSD(单重和双重激发的电子相关运动耦合簇)。总共通过所有三种方法可以获得 111 个低能单重激发三重态。以 MRCISD+Q(单重和双重激发的多参考组态相互作用加上戴维森校正)的结果作为基准,发现 U-TD-DFT 和 EOM-CCSD 对于那些由单重耦合单激发(SCSE)从闭壳到开壳、开壳到空壳或闭壳到空壳轨道主导的状态表现良好。然而,对于那些由单重耦合单激发(TCSE)从闭壳到空壳轨道主导的状态,U-TD-DFT 和 EOM-CCSD 由于严重的自旋污染而表现不佳。相比之下,X-TD-DFT 提供了 SCSE 和 TCSE 的平衡描述。就函数依赖性而言,发现当 Hartree-Fock 基态不受不稳定性问题影响时,全局混合(GH)和范围分离混合(RSH)泛函都比纯密度泛函表现得更好,特别是对于 Rydberg 和电荷转移激发。然而,如果 Hartree-Fock 基态不稳定或几乎不稳定,GH 和 RSH 往往会严重低估激发能。SAOP(模型轨道势的统计平均)的表现比任何其他密度泛函都更均匀,尽管它通常会高估价态激发的激发能。毫不奇怪,EOM-CCSD 和绝热 TD-DFT 都无法描述具有实质性双激发特征的激发态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验