Pérez-Diaz Carlos, Calixto Omar-Javier, Faccini-Martínez Álvaro A, Bravo-Ojeda Juan S, Botero-García Carlos A, Uribe-Pardo Erika, Mantilla-Florez Yesid F, Benitez Fabian, Duran Ada, Osorio Johana
Infectious Diseases Department, Clinica Marly, Bogotá, Colombia ; Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital de la Samaritana, Bogotá, Colombia ; Servicios y asesorías en infectología (SAI), Calle 50 # 13-62, 110231420, Bogotá, Colombia.
Servicios y asesorías en infectología (SAI), Calle 50 # 13-62, 110231420, Bogotá, Colombia.
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015 Dec 16;10:45. doi: 10.1186/s12995-015-0088-z. eCollection 2015.
Occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens caused by percutaneous injuries or mucosal contamination is frequent among Healthcare Workers (HCW).
A cross-sectional analysis of HCW with an occupational exposure to blood reported to professional risk insurance agencies between 2009 and 2014 was performed. Comparisons between groups according to exposure level (mild, moderate, and severe) were evaluated.
Two thousand, four hundred three reports were classified according exposure as mild 2.7 %, moderate 74.8 %, severe 21.9 %. Factors related: health sciences student with mild exposure events [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 11.91, 95 % CI 5.13-27.61, p < 0.00001], and physician with moderate exposure events (AOR 1.90, 95 % CI 1.17-3.07, p = 0.009). Factors inversely related: physician with severe exposure events (AOR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.32-0.91, p = 0.02) and health sciences student with moderate exposure events (AOR 0.08, 95 % CI 0.04-0.15, p < 0.00001). It was found an important relationship between severe events with infectious diseases specialist assessment, and follow-up adherence. Additionally, a case of Human Immunodeficiency Virus seroconversion was presented (0.0004 %), no other seroconversions were observed.
Occupational exposure events must be managed according to established protocols, but adherence failure was evident with the exception of severe exposure cases. Thus, interventions to enhance occupational safety are required. Occupation must be considered as a risk factor during initial assessment of events.
医护人员(HCW)中,因经皮损伤或黏膜污染导致的职业性血源性病原体暴露很常见。
对2009年至2014年间向职业风险保险机构报告有职业性血液暴露的医护人员进行横断面分析。评估了根据暴露水平(轻度、中度和重度)分组之间的差异。
2403份报告根据暴露情况分类为轻度2.7%,中度74.8%,重度21.9%。相关因素:健康科学专业学生发生轻度暴露事件[调整优势比(AOR)11.91,95%置信区间5.13 - 27.61,p < 0.00001],以及医生发生中度暴露事件(AOR 1.90,95%置信区间1.17 - 3.07,p = 0.009)。负相关因素:医生发生重度暴露事件(AOR 0.54,95%置信区间0.32 - 0.91,p = 0.02)和健康科学专业学生发生中度暴露事件(AOR 0.08,95%置信区间0.04 - 0.15,p < 0.00001)。发现重度事件与传染病专家评估及随访依从性之间存在重要关系。此外,报告了1例人类免疫缺陷病毒血清转化病例(0.0004%),未观察到其他血清转化情况。
职业暴露事件必须按照既定方案进行处理,但除重度暴露病例外,依从性不足明显。因此,需要采取干预措施以提高职业安全性。在事件初始评估期间,职业应被视为一个风险因素。