Magnusson Peter, Gadler Fredrik, Liv Per, Mörner Stellan
Cardiology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital/Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;39(3):291-301. doi: 10.1111/pace.12801. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
Risk stratification of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is mainly based on evaluations from patients at highly specialized centers.
To evaluate risk markers for appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in an unselected, nationwide cohort of HCM.
Patients with an ICD due to HCM were identified from the Swedish ICD Registry since its start in 1995, merged with Patient Register data, and medical records were retrieved. Risk markers for ventricular arrhythmias leading to appropriate ICD therapy were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR).
Of 321 patients (70.1% males), at least one appropriate therapy occurred in 77 (24.0%) during a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (5.3% per year; primary prevention 4.5%, secondary prevention 7.0%). Cumulative incidences at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 8.1%, 15.3%, and 21.3%, respectively. Cardioversion effectively restored rhythm in 52% of the first episode and antitachycardia pacing was sufficient in the remaining. For the whole cohort, ejection fraction (EF) <50% (HR 2.63; P < 0.001) was associated with appropriate ICD therapy. In primary prevention, patients with established risk markers experienced appropriate therapy; atrial fibrillation (AF; HR 2.54; P = 0.010), EF < 50% (HR 2.78; P = 0.004), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (HR 1.80; P = 0.109) had the highest HR, and wall thickness ≥ 30 mm, syncope, exercise blood pressure response, or family history of SCD had weaker associations.
ICD therapy successfully terminates ventricular arrhythmias in HCM. In addition to conventional risk markers, a history of AF or EF < 50% may be considered in risk stratification.
肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者心脏性猝死(SCD)的风险分层主要基于高度专业化中心对患者的评估。
在一个未经过筛选的全国性HCM队列中评估合适的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的风险标志物。
自1995年瑞典ICD注册登记开始,从其中识别出因HCM植入ICD的患者,并与患者登记数据合并,同时检索病历。使用Cox比例风险比(HR)分析导致合适ICD治疗的室性心律失常的风险标志物。
在321例患者(70.1%为男性)中,在平均5.4年的随访期间,77例(24.0%)至少发生了一次合适的治疗(每年发生率为5.3%;一级预防为4.5%,二级预防为7.0%)。1年、3年和5年的累积发生率分别为8.1%、15.3%和21.3%。52%的首次发作患者通过心脏转复有效恢复了心律,其余患者通过抗心动过速起搏即可。对于整个队列,射血分数(EF)<50%(HR 2.63;P<0.001)与合适的ICD治疗相关。在一级预防中,有既定风险标志物的患者接受了合适的治疗;心房颤动(AF;HR 2.54;P = 0.010)、EF<50%(HR 2.78;P = 0.004)和非持续性室性心动过速(HR 1.80;P = 0.109)的HR最高,而壁厚≥30 mm、晕厥、运动血压反应或SCD家族史的相关性较弱。
ICD治疗成功终止了HCM患者的室性心律失常。除了传统的风险标志物外,在风险分层中可考虑AF病史或EF<50%。