HCM Institute, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (B.J.M., E.J.R., M.S.M.); Department of Psychology & Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC (S.F.S.); Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Australia (C.S.); Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, MN (S.A.C., A.A., R.G.); University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City (M.G.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical & Molecular Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, University of Sapienza, Rome (C.A., P.F.); Cardiology Division, Department of Diagnostics, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena, and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Italy (G.B.); Policlinico di Monza, Italy (P.S.); St. Lukes - Roosevelt Hospital Center, NYU Lan gone Medical Center (M.V.S., A.K.); Cardiomyopathy Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy (I.O.); Atlantic Health Systems, Morristown Memorial Hospital and Medical Center, NJ (S.L.W.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Apr;11(4):e005820. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005820.
High-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are identified by contemporary risk stratification and effectively treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, long-term HCM clinical course after ICD therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias is incompletely understood.
Cohort of 486 high-risk HCM patients with ICDs was assembled from 8 international centers. Clinical course and device interventions were addressed, and survey questionnaires assessed patient anxiety level and psychological well-being related to ICD therapy. Of 486 patients, 94 (19%) experienced appropriate ICD interventions terminating ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, 3.7% per year for primary prevention, over 6.4±4.7 years. Of 94 patients, 87 were asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic at the time of appropriate ICD interventions; 74 of these 87 (85%) remained in classes I/II without significant change in clinical status over the subsequent 5.9±4.9 years (up to 22). Among the 94 patients, there was one sudden death (caused by device failure; 1.1%); 3 patients died from other HCM-related processes unrelated to arrhythmic risk (eg, end-stage heart failure). Post-ICD intervention, freedom from HCM mortality was 100%, 97%, and 92% at 1, 5, and 10 years, distinctly lower than in ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy ICD trials. HCM patients with ICD interventions reported heightened anxiety in expectation of future shocks, but with intact general psychological well-being and quality of life.
In HCM, unlike ischemic heart disease, prevention of sudden death with ICD therapy is unassociated with significant increase in cardiovascular morbidity or mortality, or transformation to heart failure deterioration. ICD therapy does not substantially impair overall psychological and physical well-being.
肥厚型心肌病(HCM)高危患者采用当代风险分层方法确定,并有效使用植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)进行治疗。然而,对于 ICD 治疗室性心动过速/心室颤动后 HCM 的长期临床病程尚不完全清楚。
从 8 个国际中心组建了一个由 486 例高危 HCM 患者组成的 ICD 队列。解决了临床病程和设备干预问题,并通过问卷调查评估了患者对 ICD 治疗的焦虑水平和心理幸福感。486 例患者中,94 例(19%)经历了适当的 ICD 干预以终止室性心动过速/心室颤动,每年 3.7%,随访时间超过 6.4±4.7 年。94 例患者中,87 例在适当的 ICD 干预时无症状或仅有轻度症状;这 87 例中的 74 例(85%)在随后的 5.9±4.9 年(最长 22 年)内仍处于 I/II 级,临床状态无显著变化。94 例患者中,1 例(1.1%)死于器械故障引起的猝死;3 例死于与心律失常风险无关的其他 HCM 相关过程(例如,终末期心力衰竭)。ICD 干预后,HCM 死亡率在 1、5 和 10 年时分别为 100%、97%和 92%,明显低于缺血性或非缺血性心肌病 ICD 试验。经历 ICD 干预的 HCM 患者报告说,他们对未来的电击感到焦虑,但总体心理和生活质量完好。
在 HCM 中,与缺血性心脏病不同,ICD 治疗预防猝死与心血管发病率或死亡率的显著增加无关,也与心力衰竭恶化无关。ICD 治疗不会显著损害整体心理和身体健康。