Rickels Michael R, Ruedy Katrina J, Foster Nicole C, Piché Claude A, Dulude Hélène, Sherr Jennifer L, Tamborlane William V, Bethin Kathleen E, DiMeglio Linda A, Wadwa R Paul, Ahmann Andrew J, Haller Michael J, Nathan Brandon M, Marcovina Santica M, Rampakakis Emmanouil, Meng Linyan, Beck Roy W
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL.
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):264-70. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1498. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
Treatment of severe hypoglycemia with loss of consciousness or seizure outside of the hospital setting is presently limited to intramuscular glucagon requiring reconstitution immediately prior to injection, a process prone to error or omission. A needle-free intranasal glucagon preparation was compared with intramuscular glucagon for treatment of insulin-induced hypoglycemia.
At eight clinical centers, a randomized crossover noninferiority trial was conducted involving 75 adults with type 1 diabetes (mean age, 33 ± 12 years; median diabetes duration, 18 years) to compare intranasal (3 mg) versus intramuscular (1 mg) glucagon for treatment of hypoglycemia induced by intravenous insulin. Success was defined as an increase in plasma glucose to ≥70 mg/dL or ≥20 mg/dL from the glucose nadir within 30 min after receiving glucagon.
Mean plasma glucose at time of glucagon administration was 48 ± 8 and 49 ± 8 mg/dL at the intranasal and intramuscular visits, respectively. Success criteria were met at all but one intranasal visit and at all intramuscular visits (98.7% vs. 100%; difference 1.3%, upper end of 1-sided 97.5% CI 4.0%). Mean time to success was 16 min for intranasal and 13 min for intramuscular (P < 0.001). Head/facial discomfort was reported during 25% of intranasal and 9% of intramuscular dosing visits; nausea (with or without vomiting) occurred with 35% and 38% of visits, respectively.
Intranasal glucagon was highly effective in treating insulin-induced hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Although the trial was conducted in a controlled setting, the results are applicable to real-world management of severe hypoglycemia, which occurs owing to excessive therapeutic insulin relative to the impaired or absent endogenous glucagon response.
在院外环境中,对于伴有意识丧失或癫痫发作的严重低血糖症的治疗,目前仅限于使用肌肉注射胰高血糖素,而这需要在注射前立即重新配制,此过程容易出现错误或遗漏。将一种无针鼻内胰高血糖素制剂与肌肉注射胰高血糖素用于胰岛素诱导的低血糖症治疗进行比较。
在八个临床中心进行了一项随机交叉非劣效性试验,纳入75名1型糖尿病成人患者(平均年龄33±12岁;糖尿病病程中位数18年),比较鼻内(3毫克)与肌肉注射(1毫克)胰高血糖素治疗静脉注射胰岛素诱导的低血糖症的效果。成功定义为在接受胰高血糖素后30分钟内,血浆葡萄糖从血糖最低点升高至≥70毫克/分升或升高≥20毫克/分升。
在鼻内给药和肌肉注射给药时,胰高血糖素给药时的平均血浆葡萄糖分别为48±8毫克/分升和49±8毫克/分升。除一次鼻内给药外,所有鼻内给药和所有肌肉注射给药均达到成功标准(98.7%对100%;差异1.3%,单侧97.5%CI上限4.0%)。鼻内给药成功的平均时间为16分钟,肌肉注射为13分钟(P<0.001)。在25%的鼻内给药和9%的肌肉注射给药过程中报告有头部/面部不适;恶心(伴或不伴呕吐)分别出现在35%和38%的给药过程中。
鼻内胰高血糖素在治疗1型糖尿病成人患者胰岛素诱导的低血糖症方面非常有效。尽管该试验是在受控环境中进行的,但结果适用于严重低血糖症的实际管理,严重低血糖症是由于相对于受损或缺乏的内源性胰高血糖素反应,治疗性胰岛素过量所致。