Suppr超能文献

心脏手术中红细胞输血的指征:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Indications for red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Patel Nishith N, Avlonitis Vassilios S, Jones Hayley E, Reeves Barnaby C, Sterne Jonathan A C, Murphy Gavin J

机构信息

National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Haematol. 2015 Dec;2(12):e543-53. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00198-2. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Good blood management is an important determinant of outcome in cardiac surgery. Guidelines recommend restrictive red blood cell transfusion. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence from randomised controlled trials and observational studies that are used to inform transfusion decisions in adult cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We did a systematic review by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and DARE, from inception to May 1, 2015, databases from specialist societies, and bibliographies of included studies and recent relevant review articles. We included randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery, and observational studies that assessed the effect of red blood cell transfusion compared with no transfusion on outcomes in adult cardiac patients after surgery. We pooled adjusted odds ratios using fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

FINDINGS

We included data from six cardiac surgical randomised controlled trials (3352 patients), 19 non-cardiac surgical trials (8361 patients), and 39 observational studies (232,806 patients). The pooled fixed effects mortality odds ratios comparing liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds was 0.70 (95% CI 0.49-1.02; p=0.060) for cardiac surgical trials and 1.10 (95% CI 0.96-1.27; p=0.16) for trials in settings other than cardiac surgery. By contrast, observational cohort studies in cardiac surgery showed that red blood cell transfusion compared with no transfusion was associated with substantially higher mortality (random effects odds ratio 2.72, 95% CI 2.11-3.49; p<0.0001) and other morbidity, although with substantial heterogeneity and small study effects.

INTERPRETATION

Evidence from randomised controlled trials in cardiac surgery refutes findings from observational studies that liberal thresholds for red blood cell transfusion are associated with a substantially increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Observational studies and trials in non-cardiac surgery should not be used to inform treatment decisions or guidelines for patients having cardiac surgery.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

良好的血液管理是心脏手术预后的重要决定因素。指南推荐限制性红细胞输血。我们的目的是系统评价用于指导成人心脏手术输血决策的随机对照试验和观察性研究的证据。

方法

我们通过检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和DARE,从数据库建立至2015年5月1日,检索专业学会的数据库以及纳入研究和近期相关综述文章的参考文献,进行了一项系统评价。我们纳入了评估宽松与限制性红细胞输血对心脏和非心脏手术患者影响的随机对照试验,以及评估红细胞输血与未输血对成人心脏手术患者术后结局影响的观察性研究。我们使用固定效应和随机效应荟萃分析汇总调整后的比值比。主要结局是30天死亡率。

结果

我们纳入了6项心脏手术随机对照试验(3352例患者)、19项非心脏手术试验(8361例患者)和39项观察性研究(232,806例患者)的数据。心脏手术试验中,比较宽松与限制性输血阈值的汇总固定效应死亡率比值比为0.70(95%可信区间0.49 - 1.02;p = 0.060),非心脏手术试验为1.10(95%可信区间0.96 - 1.27;p = 0.16)。相比之下,心脏手术的观察性队列研究表明,与未输血相比,红细胞输血与显著更高的死亡率(随机效应比值比2.72,95%可信区间2.11 - 3.49;p < 0.0001)和其他发病率相关,尽管存在显著异质性和小研究效应。

解读

心脏手术随机对照试验的证据反驳了观察性研究的结果,即宽松的红细胞输血阈值与死亡率和发病率大幅增加相关。非心脏手术的观察性研究和试验不应被用于为心脏手术患者的治疗决策或指南提供依据。

资金来源

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验