Zumstein Matthias A, Rumian Adam, Thélu Charles Édouard, Lesbats Virginie, O'Shea Kieran, Schaer Michael, Boileau Pascal
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Traumatology, L'Archet Hospital II, University of Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France.
Department of Radiology, L'Archet Hospital II, University of Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, France.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jan;25(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.018.
Because the retear rate after rotator cuff repairs remains high, methods to improve healing are very much needed. Platelet-rich concentrates have been shown to enhance tenocyte proliferation and promote extracellular matrix synthesis in vitro; however, their clinical benefit remains unclear. We hypothesized that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) results in better clinical and radiographic outcome at 12 months of follow-up than without L-PRF.
Thirty-five patients were randomized to receive arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with L-PRF locally applied to the repair site (L-PRF+ group, n = 17) or without L-PRF (L-PRF- group, n = 18). Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation included the Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog score for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant-Murley score. The anatomic watertight healing, tendon thickness, and tendon quality was evaluated using magnetic resonance arthrography at 12 months of follow-up.
No complications were reported in either group. The mean Subjective Shoulder Value, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant-Murley scores increased from preoperatively to postoperatively, showing no significant differences between the groups. Complete anatomic watertight healing was found in 11 of 17 in the L-PRF+ group and in 11 of 18 in the L-PRP- group (P = .73). The mean postoperative defect size (214 ± 130 mm(2) in the L-PRF+ group vs 161 ± 149 mm(2) in the L-PRF- group; P = .391) and the mean postoperative tendon quality according to Sugaya (L-PRF+ group: 3.0 ± 1.4, L-PRF- group: 3.0 ± 0.9) were similar in both groups at 12 months of follow-up.
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with application of L-PRF yields no beneficial effect in clinical outcome, anatomic healing rate, mean postoperative defect size, and tendon quality at 12 months of follow-up.
由于肩袖修复术后再撕裂率仍然很高,因此非常需要改善愈合的方法。富含血小板的浓缩物已被证明在体外可增强肌腱细胞增殖并促进细胞外基质合成;然而,其临床益处仍不明确。我们假设,与不使用富含白细胞和血小板的纤维蛋白(L-PRF)相比,采用L-PRF进行关节镜下肩袖修复在随访12个月时可带来更好的临床和影像学结果。
35例患者被随机分为两组,一组接受在修复部位局部应用L-PRF的关节镜下肩袖修复(L-PRF+组,n = 17),另一组不使用L-PRF(L-PRF-组,n = 18)。术前和术后的临床评估包括主观肩关节评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分、简单肩关节测试和Constant-Murley评分。在随访12个月时,使用磁共振关节造影评估解剖学上的水密愈合、肌腱厚度和肌腱质量。
两组均未报告并发症。主观肩关节评分、简单肩关节测试和Constant-Murley评分的平均值从术前到术后均有所增加,两组之间无显著差异。L-PRF+组17例中有11例实现了完全解剖学上的水密愈合,L-PRP-组18例中有11例(P = 0.73)。随访12个月时,两组术后平均缺损大小(L-PRF+组为214±130 mm²,L-PRF-组为161±149 mm²;P = 0.391)以及根据Sugaya标准的术后平均肌腱质量(L-PRF+组:3.0±1.4,L-PRF-组:3.0±0.9)相似。
应用L-PRF进行关节镜下肩袖修复在随访12个月时,对临床结果、解剖愈合率、术后平均缺损大小和肌腱质量均无有益影响。