Ishihara Lianna, Beck Melissa, Travis Sara, Akintayo Olusegun, Brickel Neil
Department of Epidemiology, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK ; Lundbeck SAS, 37-45 Quai du President Roosevelt, 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Regulated Healthcare Market Research, Concentrics Research LLC, Indianapolis, IN USA.
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2015;2(4):335-344. doi: 10.1007/s40801-015-0042-5. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
The Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for retigabine/ezogabine (RTG/EZG) required an evaluation of the effectiveness of the communication plan to communicate about the risks with use of RTG/EZG.
GlaxoSmithKline conducted a survey to assess understanding of the risk of urinary retention (UR) with RTG/EZG and to evaluate the effectiveness of the communication plan.
This was a US-based, cross-sectional, non-interventional, observational survey, conducted from February to April 2013, of physicians who had prescribed RTG/EZG in the past year, and pharmacists who had dispensed an antiepileptic drug within the past 3 months. Thirteen primary objective questions (five specific to UR risk) were included in the survey, which assessed healthcare professionals' (HCPs') understanding of UR risk and symptoms of acute UR associated with RTG/EZG. The primary outcome was the proportion of HCPs correctly answering each question. For each question, a proportion of correct responses ≥80 % was considered to represent sufficient understanding of associated risks.
Of 1028 HCPs screened, 373 participated. Six of 13 questions (3/5 specific to UR risk) met the ≥80 % threshold for correct responses in the physician cohort. No questions achieved this threshold in the total pharmacist group; however, four questions scored ≥80 % when stratified by pharmacists who had dispensed RTG/EZG.
Results demonstrated a mixed level of understanding of aspects of UR risk associated with RTG/EZG, although some risk questions did not meet the 80 % threshold, especially among pharmacists. This is likely to have been due to the short time that RTG/EZG has been available and its limited use. This study provides the first evaluation of the REMS communication plan on the risk of UR with RTG/EZG.
瑞替加滨/依佐加滨(RTG/EZG)的风险评估与降低策略(REMS)要求对关于使用RTG/EZG的风险沟通计划的有效性进行评估。
葛兰素史克公司开展了一项调查,以评估对RTG/EZG导致尿潴留(UR)风险的理解,并评估沟通计划的有效性。
这是一项于2013年2月至4月在美国进行的横断面、非干预性观察性调查,对象为过去一年中开具过RTG/EZG的医生以及过去3个月内配发过抗癫痫药物的药剂师。调查包含13个主要客观问题(5个特定于UR风险),评估了医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对UR风险以及与RTG/EZG相关的急性UR症状的理解。主要结果是HCPs正确回答每个问题的比例。对于每个问题,正确回答比例≥80%被视为对相关风险有充分理解。
在筛查的1028名HCPs中,373名参与了调查。在医生队列中,13个问题中有6个(5个特定于UR风险问题中的3个)达到了正确回答≥80%的阈值。在全体药剂师组中没有问题达到该阈值;然而,在按配发过RTG/EZG的药剂师分层时,有4个问题得分≥80%。
结果表明对与RTG/EZG相关的UR风险各方面的理解程度不一,尽管一些风险问题未达到80%的阈值,尤其是在药剂师中。这可能是由于RTG/EZG上市时间短且使用有限。本研究首次对REMS关于RTG/EZG导致UR风险的沟通计划进行了评估。