Lowrie Mark, Thomson Sarah, Bessant Claire, Sparkes Andrew, Harvey Robert J, Garosi Laurent
1 Davies Veterinary Specialists, Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK.
Current address: Dovecote Veterinary Hospital, Castle Donington, Derby, UK.
J Feline Med Surg. 2017 Feb;19(2):200-206. doi: 10.1177/1098612X15622806. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
Objectives Currently, there are no published randomised, controlled veterinary trials evaluating the efficacy of antiepileptic medication in the treatment of myoclonic seizures. Myoclonic seizures are a hallmark of feline audiogenic seizures (FARS). Methods This prospective, randomised, open-label trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (20-25 mg/kg q8h) with phenobarbital (3-5 mg/kg q12h) in cats with suspected FARS that experienced myoclonic seizures. Cats were included that had ⩾12 myoclonic seizure days during a prospective 12 week baseline period. This was followed by a 4 week titration phase (until a therapeutic serum concentration of phenobarbital was achieved) and a 12 week treatment phase. Results Fifty-seven cats completed the study: 28 in the levetiracetam group and 29 in the phenobarbital group. A reduction of ⩾50% in the number of myoclonic seizure days was seen in 100% of patients in the levetiracetam group and in 3% of patients in the phenobarbital group ( P <0.001) during the treatment period. Levetiracetam-treated cats had higher freedom from myoclonic seizures (50.0% vs 0%; P <0.001) during the treatment period. The most common adverse events were lethargy, inappetence and ataxia, with no difference in incidence between levetiracetam and phenobarbital. Adverse events were mild and transient with levetiracetam but persistent with phenobarbital. Conclusions and relevance These results suggest that levetiracetam is an effective and well tolerated treatment for cats with myoclonic seizures and is more effective than phenobarbital. Whether it will prevent the occurrence of generalised tonic-clonic seizures and other forebrain signs if used early in the course of FARS is not yet clear.
目的 目前,尚无已发表的随机对照兽医试验评估抗癫痫药物治疗肌阵挛性癫痫发作的疗效。肌阵挛性癫痫发作是猫听觉性癫痫发作(FARS)的一个标志。方法 这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验比较了左乙拉西坦(20 - 25 mg/kg,每8小时一次)与苯巴比妥(3 - 5 mg/kg,每12小时一次)对疑似患有肌阵挛性癫痫发作的FARS猫的疗效和耐受性。纳入在为期12周的前瞻性基线期内有≥12个肌阵挛性癫痫发作日的猫。随后是4周的滴定阶段(直至达到苯巴比妥的治疗性血清浓度)和12周的治疗阶段。结果 57只猫完成了研究:左乙拉西坦组28只,苯巴比妥组29只。在治疗期间,左乙拉西坦组100%的患者和苯巴比妥组3%的患者肌阵挛性癫痫发作日数减少≥50%(P<0.001)。左乙拉西坦治疗的猫在治疗期间无肌阵挛性癫痫发作的自由度更高(50.0%对0%;P<0.001)。最常见的不良事件是嗜睡、食欲不振和共济失调,左乙拉西坦和苯巴比妥之间的发生率无差异。左乙拉西坦引起的不良事件轻微且短暂,而苯巴比妥引起的不良事件持续存在。结论及相关性 这些结果表明,左乙拉西坦是治疗猫肌阵挛性癫痫发作的一种有效且耐受性良好的药物,比苯巴比妥更有效。如果在FARS病程早期使用,它是否能预防全身性强直阵挛性癫痫发作和其他前脑症状尚不清楚。