Suppr超能文献

抗癫痫药物治疗猫癫痫安全性与有效性的系统评价

Systematic review of antiepileptic drugs' safety and effectiveness in feline epilepsy.

作者信息

Charalambous Marios, Pakozdy Akos, Bhatti Sofie F M, Volk Holger A

机构信息

Small Animal Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Clinical Unit of Internal Medicine Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Vet Res. 2018 Mar 2;14(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1386-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding the efficacy and safety profile of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in feline epilepsy is a crucial consideration for managing this important brain disease. However, there is a lack of information about the treatment of feline epilepsy and therefore a systematic review was constructed to assess current evidence for the AEDs' efficacy and tolerability in cats. The methods and materials of our former systematic reviews in canine epilepsy were mostly mirrored for the current systematic review in cats. Databases of PubMed, CAB Direct and Google scholar were searched to detect peer-reviewed studies reporting efficacy and/or adverse effects of AEDs in cats. The studies were assessed with regards to their quality of evidence, i.e. study design, study population, diagnostic criteria and overall risk of bias and the outcome measures reported, i.e. prevalence and 95% confidence interval of the successful and affected population in each study and in total.

RESULTS

Forty studies describing clinical outcomes of AEDs' efficacy and safety were included. Only two studies were classified as "blinded randomised controlled trials". The majority of the studies offered high overall risk of bias and described low feline populations with unclear diagnostic criteria and short treatment or follow-up periods. Individual AED assessments of efficacy and safety profile showed that phenobarbital might currently be considered as the first choice AED followed by levetiracetam and imepitoin. Only imepitoin's safety profile was supported by strong level of evidence. Imepitoin's efficacy as well as remaining AEDs' efficacy and safety profile were supported by weak level of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review reflects an evidence-based assessment of the published data on the AEDs' efficacy and safety for feline epilepsy. Currently, phenobarbital is likely to be the first-line for feline epileptic patients followed by levetiracetam and imepitoin. It is essential that clinicians evaluate both AEDs' effectiveness and tolerability before tailoring AED to the individual patient. Further studies in feline epilepsy treatment are by far crucial in order to establish definite guidelines for AEDs' efficacy and safety.

摘要

背景

了解抗癫痫药物(AEDs)治疗猫癫痫的疗效和安全性概况是管理这种重要脑部疾病的关键考量因素。然而,关于猫癫痫治疗的信息匮乏,因此开展了一项系统评价,以评估目前有关AEDs对猫的疗效和耐受性的证据。我们之前对犬癫痫进行系统评价的方法和材料,在本次针对猫的系统评价中大多得以借鉴。检索了PubMed、CAB Direct和谷歌学术数据库,以查找报告AEDs对猫的疗效和/或不良反应的同行评审研究。根据证据质量对这些研究进行评估,即研究设计、研究人群、诊断标准以及总体偏倚风险,同时评估报告的结局指标,即每项研究及总体中成功和受影响人群的患病率及95%置信区间。

结果

纳入了40项描述AEDs疗效和安全性临床结果的研究。只有两项研究被归类为“盲法随机对照试验”。大多数研究总体偏倚风险较高,所描述的猫的数量较少,诊断标准不明确,治疗或随访期较短。对AEDs疗效和安全性概况的个体评估表明,目前苯巴比妥可能被视为首选的AED,其次是左乙拉西坦和依美匹托因。只有依美匹托因的安全性概况得到了强有力的证据支持。依美匹托因的疗效以及其余AEDs的疗效和安全性概况得到的证据支持较弱。

结论

本系统评价反映了基于证据对已发表的关于AEDs治疗猫癫痫的疗效和安全性数据的评估。目前,苯巴比妥可能是猫癫痫患者的一线用药,其次是左乙拉西坦和依美匹托因。临床医生在为个体患者定制AED之前,评估AEDs的有效性和耐受性至关重要。为了确立AEDs疗效和安全性的明确指南,目前对猫癫痫治疗的进一步研究至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7c/5834883/ae127d433fb9/12917_2018_1386_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验