Dodds Catherine, Weait Matthew, Bourne Adam, Egede Siri
Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK.
School of Law, Birkbeck College , London , UK.
Crit Public Health. 2015 Aug 8;25(4):410-426. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1019835. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
We present qualitative research findings about how perceptions of criminal prosecutions for the transmission of HIV interact with the provision of high-quality HIV health and social care in England and Wales. Seven focus groups were undertaken with a total of 75 diverse professionals working in clinical and community-based services for people with HIV. Participants' understanding of the law in this area was varied, with many knowing the basic requirements for a prosecution, yet lacking confidence in the best way to communicate key details with those using their service. Prosecutions for HIV transmission have influenced, and in some instances, disrupted the provision of HIV services, creating ambivalence and concern among many providers about their new role as providers of legal information. The way that participants approached the topic with service users was influenced by their personal views on individual and shared responsibility for health, their concerns about professional liability and their degree of trust in non-coercive health promotion approaches to managing public health. These findings reveal an underlying ambivalence among many providers about how they regard the interface between criminal law, coercion and public health. It is also apparent that in most HIV service environments, meaningful exploration of practical ethical issues is relatively rare. The data presented here will additionally be of use to managers and providers of HIV services in order that they can provide consistent and confident support and advice to people with HIV.
我们展示了关于在英格兰和威尔士,对因传播艾滋病毒而进行刑事起诉的认知如何与提供高质量艾滋病毒健康和社会护理相互作用的定性研究结果。我们与75名在为艾滋病毒感染者提供临床和社区服务的不同专业人员进行了7个焦点小组讨论。参与者对这一领域法律的理解各不相同,许多人知道起诉的基本要求,但在与使用其服务的人沟通关键细节的最佳方式上缺乏信心。因传播艾滋病毒而进行的起诉已经影响,并且在某些情况下扰乱了艾滋病毒服务的提供,在许多提供者中引发了矛盾心理,并使他们对自己作为法律信息提供者的新角色感到担忧。参与者与服务使用者探讨该话题的方式受到他们对个人和共同健康责任的个人观点、对职业责任的担忧以及对管理公共卫生的非强制性健康促进方法的信任程度的影响。这些发现揭示了许多提供者在如何看待刑法、强制手段和公共卫生之间的关系上存在潜在的矛盾心理。同样明显的是,在大多数艾滋病毒服务环境中,对实际伦理问题进行有意义的探讨相对较少。这里呈现的数据对艾滋病毒服务的管理者和提供者也将有用,以便他们能够为艾滋病毒感染者提供一致且自信的支持和建议。