Suppr超能文献

心室压力-容积关系作为评估心脏力学的主要依据。回到弗兰克图表。

Ventricular pressure-volume relations as the primary basis for evaluation of cardiac mechanics. Return to Frank's diagram.

作者信息

Jacob R, Kissling G

机构信息

Physiologisches Institut II, Universität Tübingen, FRG.

出版信息

Basic Res Cardiol. 1989 May-Jun;84(3):227-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01907971.

Abstract

Considering ventricular function from the vantage point of the pressure-volume (P-V) diagram permits not only quantification of ventricular working capacity under normal and pathophysiological conditions but also promotes understanding of cardiac dynamics including prediction of the effects of mechanical and pharmacological interventions. Therefore it seems appropriate, at least intellectually, to classify all measured volume and pressure data into the scheme of the P-V diagram. The use of so-called contractility indices and also the restriction to the end-systolic P-V relation alone means deliberate renunciation of important information. In principle, Frank's original concept can be confirmed which, under afterloaded conditions, implies the existence of distinct end-systolic P-V curves each related to a particular end-diastolic volume. As an approximation, however, the assumption of one common end-systolic P-V relation seems tolerable. Based on Frank's diagram, a concept for assessment of ventricular and myocardial function is presented following a discussion of the determinants of the diastolic and end-systolic P-V relations, as well as the methodological difficulties and different notions with regard to the end-systolic P-V curve. The P-V area between the curves of systolic maxima and diastolic minima, up to a defined end-diastolic pressure, is recommended as a measure for quantitative evaluation of ventricular working capacity. Transformation into stress-length (sigma-l) relations is indispensable for assessment of myocardial function under the conditions of changed ventricular geometry. The normalized sigma-l area yields a measure for interindividual evaluation of myocardial working capacity. This concept of evaluation does not mean acknowledgement of the visco-elastic theory of muscle contraction nor of the Emax concept. The P-V and sigma-l relations must, however, be complemented by time related parameters in order to estimate ventricular and myocardial power capacity. After a long-lasting search through international literature for "contractility indices" of general applicability and significance it seems appropriate to return to Frank's diagram as the primary basis for evaluating cardiac mechanics.

摘要

从压力-容积(P-V)图的角度来考量心室功能,不仅能够对正常和病理生理条件下心室的工作能力进行量化,还能促进对心脏动力学的理解,包括预测机械和药物干预的效果。因此,至少在理论上,将所有测量的容积和压力数据归类到P-V图的框架中似乎是合适的。使用所谓的收缩性指数,以及仅局限于收缩末期P-V关系,意味着有意舍弃重要信息。原则上,弗兰克的原始概念可以得到证实,即在有后负荷的情况下,意味着存在各自与特定舒张末期容积相关的不同收缩末期P-V曲线。然而,作为一种近似,假设存在一个共同的收缩末期P-V关系似乎是可以接受的。基于弗兰克图,在讨论舒张期和收缩末期P-V关系的决定因素,以及收缩末期P-V曲线的方法学困难和不同概念之后,提出了一种评估心室和心肌功能的概念。建议将收缩期最大值和舒张期最小值曲线之间、直至定义的舒张末期压力的P-V面积,作为心室工作能力定量评估的指标。在心室几何形状改变的情况下,转换为应力-长度(σ-l)关系对于评估心肌功能是必不可少的。标准化的σ-l面积可作为个体间心肌工作能力评估的指标。这种评估概念并不意味着认可肌肉收缩的粘弹性理论,也不认可Emax概念。然而,P-V和σ-l关系必须辅以与时间相关的参数,以便估计心室和心肌的功率容量。在对具有普遍适用性和重要性的“收缩性指数”进行了长期的国际文献检索之后,似乎有必要回归到弗兰克图,将其作为评估心脏力学的主要基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验