Parker M Alec
J Am Coll Dent. 2015 Summer;82(3):12-7.
On February 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered a six-to-three opinion in favor of the Federal Trade Commission in their dispute with the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners concerning teeth-whitening services provided by nondentists. That decision was the culmination of almost nine years of arguments and allegations that began with a disagreement regarding the definition of the practice of dentistry. The ethical aspect of this dispute resides in the one's perspective regarding the motivation behind the actions taken in the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners.
2015年2月25日,美国最高法院以6比3的投票结果作出裁决,支持联邦贸易委员会,该委员会与北卡罗来纳州牙科考试委员会就非牙医提供牙齿美白服务一事存在争议。这一裁决是近九年来争论和指控的 culmination,争论始于对牙科执业定义的分歧。这场争议的伦理层面在于人们对北卡罗来纳州牙科考试委员会所采取行动背后动机的看法。 (注:原文中“culmination”未翻译完整,可补充为“最终结果”等合适表述)