Reinders Yvonne, Völler Daniel, Bosserhoff Anja-K, Oefner Peter J, Reinders Jörg
Department of Biochemistry I, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1394:101-108. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3341-9_8.
Precise quantification is a major issue in contemporary proteomics. Both stable-isotope-labeling and label-free methods have been established for differential protein quantification and both approaches have different advantages and disadvantages. The present protocol uses the superior precision of label-free SWATH-mass spectrometry to test for suitability of cell lines for a SILAC-labeling approach as systematic regulations may be introduced upon incorporation of the "heavy" amino acids. The SILAC-labeled cell cultures can afterwards be used for further analyses where stable-isotope-labeling is mandatory or has substantial advantages over label-free approaches such as pulse-chase-experiments and differential protein interaction analyses based on co-immunoprecipitation. As SWATH-mass spectrometry avoids the missing-value-problem typically caused by undersampling in highly complex samples and shows superior precision for the quantification, it is better suited for the detection of systematic changes caused by the SILAC-labeling and thus, can serve as a useful tool to test cell lines for changes upon SILAC-labeling.
精确量化是当代蛋白质组学中的一个主要问题。稳定同位素标记法和无标记法都已用于差异蛋白质定量,这两种方法各有优缺点。本方案利用无标记SWATH质谱的卓越精度来测试细胞系是否适合采用SILAC标记法,因为引入“重”氨基酸后可能会引入系统性调控。之后,SILAC标记的细胞培养物可用于进一步分析,在这些分析中,稳定同位素标记是必需的,或者比无标记方法具有显著优势,如脉冲追踪实验和基于免疫共沉淀的差异蛋白质相互作用分析。由于SWATH质谱避免了通常由高度复杂样品中的欠采样导致的缺失值问题,并且在定量方面表现出卓越的精度,因此它更适合检测由SILAC标记引起的系统性变化,从而可以作为一种有用的工具来测试细胞系在SILAC标记后的变化。