Yuan Le-Yang, Liu Xiao-Xiang, Zhang E
Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, Hubei Province, P. R. China Zhejiang Museum of Natural History, Hangzhou, 310014, China.; Email:
Faculty of Basic Medicine, Zhejiang Medical College, Hangzhou, China.; Email:
Zootaxa. 2015 Dec 21;4059(1):151-68. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4059.1.8.
Sequences from the mitochondrial control region of 14 putative species of Acrossocheilus (Cyprinidae) were examined to elucidate phylogenetic relationships within species of the barred group in that genus. Phylogenetic reconstructions were generated using three tree-building methods: maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference. The resultant phylogenies were consistent with monophyly of the majority of the morphologically recognized species. However, mitochondrial DNA sequence evidence is incongruent with monophyly of A. fasciatus, as currently conceived. This species occurs only in the upper Qiantang-Jiang basin in Zhejiang and Anhui provinces, and coastal rivers in the Zhejiang Province. The species formerly recognized as A. paradoxus from Zhejiang Province is A. fasciatus. The specimens previously reported as A. fasciatus from river basins in Fujian Province are misidentified A. wuyiensis. The barred group of Acrossocheilus is shown to be polyphyletic. Acrossocheilus is restricted to the barred species here placed in "Clade II," containing A. paradoxus and relatives. Separate generic status is recommended for A. monticola and for A. longipinnis and their closest relatives, although more information on phylogenetic relationships based on multiple genes is required to develop robust phylogenetic hypotheses and diagnoses. Masticbarbus Tang, 1942 is available for A. longipinnis and three allied species (A. iridescens, A. microstomus and A. lamus).
对14种假定的光唇鱼属(鲤科)鱼类线粒体控制区的序列进行了研究,以阐明该属条纹类群物种间的系统发育关系。使用三种建树方法构建了系统发育树:最大简约法、最大似然法和贝叶斯推断法。所得的系统发育树与大多数形态学上认可的物种的单系性一致。然而,线粒体DNA序列证据与目前所认为的条纹光唇鱼的单系性不一致。该物种仅分布于浙江和安徽的钱塘江上段流域以及浙江省的沿海河流。以前被认为来自浙江省的似原缨口鳅现应为条纹光唇鱼。先前报道来自福建省流域的条纹光唇鱼标本被误鉴定为武夷光唇鱼。光唇鱼属的条纹类群被证明是多系的。光唇鱼属仅限于这里置于“分支II”中的条纹物种,包括似原缨口鳅及其近缘种。建议为福建光唇鱼以及长鳍光唇鱼及其最亲近的近缘种设立独立的属级地位,不过需要更多基于多个基因的系统发育关系信息来构建可靠的系统发育假说和诊断。1942年的须唇鱼属可用于长鳍光唇鱼及三个近缘物种(虹彩光唇鱼、小口光唇鱼和拉氏光唇鱼)。