Suppr超能文献

拉伸效果:高强度与中等时长对比低强度与长时间。

Stretching Effects: High-intensity & Moderate-duration vs. Low-intensity & Long-duration.

作者信息

Freitas S R, Vaz J R, Bruno P M, Andrade R, Mil-Homens P

机构信息

Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa, Desporto e Saúde, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.

Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Laboratory of Motor Behavior, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;37(3):239-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548946. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

Abstract

This study examined whether a high-intensity, moderate-duration bout of stretching would produce the same acute effects as a low-intensity, long-duration bout of stretching. 17 volunteers performed 2 knee-flexor stretching protocols: a high-intensity stretch (i. e., 100% of maximum tolerable passive torque) with a moderate duration (243.5 ± 69.5-s); and a low-intensity stretch (50% of tolerable passive torque) with a long duration (900-s). Passive torque at a given sub-maximal angle, peak passive torque, maximal range of motion (ROM), and muscle activity were assessed before and after each stretching protocol (at intervals of 1, 30 and 60 min). The maximal ROM and tolerable passive torque increased for all time points following the high-intensity stretching (p<0.05), but not after the low-intensity protocol (p>0.05). 1 min post-stretching, the passive torque decreased in both protocols, but to a greater extent in the low-intensity protocol. 30 min post-test, torque returned to baseline for the low-intensity protocol and had increased above the baseline for the high-intensity stretches. The following can be concluded: 1) High-intensity stretching increases the maximal ROM and peak passive torque compared to low-intensity stretching; 2) low-intensity, long-duration stretching is the best way to acutely decrease passive torque; and 3) high-intensity, moderate-duration stretching increases passive torque above the baseline 30 min after stretching.

摘要

本研究考察了一次高强度、中等时长的拉伸是否会产生与低强度、长时间拉伸相同的急性效应。17名志愿者进行了两种屈膝肌拉伸方案:一种是高强度拉伸(即最大可耐受被动扭矩的100%),持续时间中等(243.5±69.5秒);另一种是低强度拉伸(可耐受被动扭矩的50%),持续时间较长(900秒)。在每次拉伸方案前后(间隔1、30和60分钟)评估给定次最大角度下的被动扭矩、被动扭矩峰值、最大运动范围(ROM)和肌肉活动。高强度拉伸后所有时间点的最大ROM和可耐受被动扭矩均增加(p<0.05),但低强度方案后未增加(p>0.05)。拉伸后1分钟,两种方案中的被动扭矩均下降,但低强度方案下降幅度更大。测试后30分钟,低强度方案的扭矩恢复到基线水平,而高强度拉伸的扭矩高于基线水平。可以得出以下结论:1)与低强度拉伸相比,高强度拉伸可增加最大ROM和被动扭矩峰值;2)低强度、长时间拉伸是急性降低被动扭矩的最佳方法;3)高强度、中等时长拉伸在拉伸后30分钟使被动扭矩高于基线水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验