Freitas S R, Vaz J R, Bruno P M, Andrade R, Mil-Homens P
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa, Desporto e Saúde, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Laboratory of Motor Behavior, Lisboa, Portugal.
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;37(3):239-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548946. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
This study examined whether a high-intensity, moderate-duration bout of stretching would produce the same acute effects as a low-intensity, long-duration bout of stretching. 17 volunteers performed 2 knee-flexor stretching protocols: a high-intensity stretch (i. e., 100% of maximum tolerable passive torque) with a moderate duration (243.5 ± 69.5-s); and a low-intensity stretch (50% of tolerable passive torque) with a long duration (900-s). Passive torque at a given sub-maximal angle, peak passive torque, maximal range of motion (ROM), and muscle activity were assessed before and after each stretching protocol (at intervals of 1, 30 and 60 min). The maximal ROM and tolerable passive torque increased for all time points following the high-intensity stretching (p<0.05), but not after the low-intensity protocol (p>0.05). 1 min post-stretching, the passive torque decreased in both protocols, but to a greater extent in the low-intensity protocol. 30 min post-test, torque returned to baseline for the low-intensity protocol and had increased above the baseline for the high-intensity stretches. The following can be concluded: 1) High-intensity stretching increases the maximal ROM and peak passive torque compared to low-intensity stretching; 2) low-intensity, long-duration stretching is the best way to acutely decrease passive torque; and 3) high-intensity, moderate-duration stretching increases passive torque above the baseline 30 min after stretching.
本研究考察了一次高强度、中等时长的拉伸是否会产生与低强度、长时间拉伸相同的急性效应。17名志愿者进行了两种屈膝肌拉伸方案:一种是高强度拉伸(即最大可耐受被动扭矩的100%),持续时间中等(243.5±69.5秒);另一种是低强度拉伸(可耐受被动扭矩的50%),持续时间较长(900秒)。在每次拉伸方案前后(间隔1、30和60分钟)评估给定次最大角度下的被动扭矩、被动扭矩峰值、最大运动范围(ROM)和肌肉活动。高强度拉伸后所有时间点的最大ROM和可耐受被动扭矩均增加(p<0.05),但低强度方案后未增加(p>0.05)。拉伸后1分钟,两种方案中的被动扭矩均下降,但低强度方案下降幅度更大。测试后30分钟,低强度方案的扭矩恢复到基线水平,而高强度拉伸的扭矩高于基线水平。可以得出以下结论:1)与低强度拉伸相比,高强度拉伸可增加最大ROM和被动扭矩峰值;2)低强度、长时间拉伸是急性降低被动扭矩的最佳方法;3)高强度、中等时长拉伸在拉伸后30分钟使被动扭矩高于基线水平。