Suppr超能文献

甲氨蝶呤单剂量与两剂量给药治疗异位妊娠的随机对照试验。

Single-dose versus two-dose administration of methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Song Taejong, Kim Mi Kyoung, Kim Mi-La, Jung Yong Wook, Yun Bo Seong, Seong Seok Ju

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, 650-9 Yeoksam-1 Dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-081, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):332-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev312. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Can a two-dose methotrexate treatment protocol improve the treatment success rate compared with a single-dose protocol in women with an ectopic pregnancy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The two-dose protocol was not superior to the single-dose protocol for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Although the two-dose methotrexate protocol for ectopic pregnancy was recently introduced to combine the efficacy and convenience of the fixed multi-dose and single-dose protocols, studies comparing the success rates, treatment satisfaction and acceptability of the single-dose and two-dose treatment protocols for ectopic pregnancy are currently lacking.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A randomized trial was conducted on 92 participants with tubal ectopic pregnancy, between May 2013 and April 2015.

PARTICIPANT/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with tubal ectopic pregnancy and who elected to undergo systemic methotrexate treatment were randomly assigned to follow either the single-dose (n = 46) or two-dose protocol (n = 46). The primary outcome measure was treatment success without surgical intervention. The secondary outcome measures were the incidence of methotrexate-associated side effects, β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) resolution time, cost of care received and treatment satisfaction.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The success rates between the single-dose and two-dose groups did not show a significant difference [82.6 versus 87.0%; relative risk (RR) 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.13]. However, the success rate in a subgroup of participants with a pretreatment β-hCG level of >5000 mIU/ml appeared to be higher in the two-dose group than in the single-dose group (80.0 versus 58.8%), although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in methotrexate-associated side effects, cost or treatment satisfaction were observed between the groups. The two-dose group required a lower number of days for the β-hCG level to decrease to <5 mIU/ml than the single-dose group (25.7 ± 13.6 versus 31.9 ± 14.1 days; P = 0.025).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Some caution is warranted in interpreting the results due to an overoptimistic sample size calculation on the basis of the biggest difference as reported in literature between the success rates of two protocols.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The single-dose protocol with the option to elaborate to a second dose in the case of treatment failure could stand as the treatment for most cases of ectopic pregnancy.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPLETING OF INTERESTS: None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

www.clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT01855568.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

10 May 2013.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 26 May 2013.

摘要

研究问题

与单剂量方案相比,两剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗方案能否提高异位妊娠女性的治疗成功率?

简要回答

两剂量方案在治疗异位妊娠方面并不优于单剂量方案。

已知信息

尽管最近引入了用于异位妊娠的两剂量甲氨蝶呤方案,以结合固定多剂量和单剂量方案的疗效和便利性,但目前缺乏比较异位妊娠单剂量和两剂量治疗方案成功率、治疗满意度和可接受性的研究。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:2013年5月至2015年4月,对92例输卵管异位妊娠患者进行了一项随机试验。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:被诊断为输卵管异位妊娠并选择接受全身甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者被随机分配接受单剂量方案(n = 46)或两剂量方案(n = 46)。主要结局指标是无需手术干预的治疗成功率。次要结局指标是甲氨蝶呤相关副作用的发生率、β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)下降时间、所接受护理的费用和治疗满意度。

主要结果及机遇的作用

两组之间的基线特征没有差异。单剂量组和两剂量组之间的成功率没有显著差异[82.6%对87.0%;相对风险(RR)0.95;95%置信区间(CI)0.80 - 1.13]。然而,在治疗前β-hCG水平>5000 mIU/ml的参与者亚组中,两剂量组的成功率似乎高于单剂量组(80.0%对58.8%),尽管差异无统计学意义。两组之间在甲氨蝶呤相关副作用、费用或治疗满意度方面未观察到显著差异。两剂量组β-hCG水平降至<5 mIU/ml所需的天数比单剂量组少(25.7±13.6天对31.9±14.1天;P = 0.025)。

局限性、谨慎理由:由于基于文献报道的两种方案成功率之间的最大差异进行了过于乐观的样本量计算,因此在解释结果时应谨慎。

研究结果的更广泛影响

单剂量方案在治疗失败时可选择追加第二剂,可作为大多数异位妊娠病例的治疗方法。

研究资金/利益冲突:无。

试验注册号

www.clinicaltrials.gov,编号NCT01855568。

试验注册日期

2013年5月10日。

首例患者入组日期

2013年5月26日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验