Waxman Alan G, Buenconsejo-Lum Lee E, Cremer Miriam, Feldman Sarah, Ault Kevin A, Cain Joanna M, Diaz Maria Lina
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM; 2Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Pacific Regional Cancer Programs, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH; 4Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; 6Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA; and 7Molina Healthcare of Florida, Doral, FL.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Jan;20(1):97-104. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000161.
Successful cervical cancer screening in the United States-Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) is limited by geographic, political, economic, and logistic factors. An expert panel convened to examine screening in each of the 6 island jurisdictions and to explore options beyond cytology-based screening.
Forty-one representatives of American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, government agencies, the World Health Organization, Pan American Health Organization, health representatives of the 6 Pacific island jurisdictions, Puerto Rico, and several academic institutions met in a 2-day meeting to explore options to improve access and coverage of cervical cancer screening in the USAPI.
Cytology-based screening is less widely accessed and less successful in the USAPI than in the United States in general. Barriers include geographic isolation, cultural factors, and lack of resources. Cytology-based screening requires multiple visits to complete the process from screening to treatment. Screen-and-treat regimens based on visual inspection with acetic acid or human papillomavirus requiring 1 or 2 visits have the potential to improve cervical cancer prevention in the USAPI.
The standard US algorithm of cytology screening followed by colposcopy and treatment is less effective in geographically and culturally isolated regions such as the USAPI. Alternate technologies, both high tech, such as primary human papillomavirus screening, and low tech, such as visual inspection with acetic acid, have shown promise in resource-poor countries and may have applicability in these US jurisdictions.
美国附属太平洋岛屿(USAPI)宫颈癌筛查的成功受到地理、政治、经济和后勤因素的限制。一个专家小组召开会议,审查6个岛屿管辖区各自的筛查情况,并探索基于细胞学筛查之外的其他选择。
美国妇产科学院、美国阴道镜和宫颈病理学会、政府机构、世界卫生组织、泛美卫生组织、6个太平洋岛屿管辖区、波多黎各的卫生代表以及几个学术机构的41名代表参加了为期两天的会议,探讨改善USAPI宫颈癌筛查可及性和覆盖率的选择。
与美国总体情况相比,基于细胞学的筛查在USAPI的可及性较低且成功率较低。障碍包括地理隔离、文化因素和资源匮乏。基于细胞学的筛查需要多次就诊才能完成从筛查到治疗的过程。基于醋酸目视检查或人乳头瘤病毒的筛查-治疗方案只需1或2次就诊,有可能改善USAPI的宫颈癌预防。
在美国标准的细胞学筛查算法之后进行阴道镜检查和治疗,在像USAPI这样地理和文化上孤立的地区效果较差。高科技的替代技术,如原发性人乳头瘤病毒筛查,以及低技术的替代技术,如醋酸目视检查,在资源匮乏国家已显示出前景,可能适用于这些美国管辖区。