Hermans Tom J N, Fransen van de Putte Elisabeth E, Horenblas Simon, Lemmens Valery, Aben Katja, van der Heijden Michiel S, Beerepoot Laurens V, Verhoeven Rob H, van Rhijn Bas W G
Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Feb;54:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
In Europe, population-based data concerning perioperative treatment (PT) and radical cystectomy (RC) are lacking. We assessed temporal trends in PT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NAC], neoadjuvant radiotherapy [NAR], adjuvant chemotherapy [AC], adjuvant radiotherapy [AR]) and RC in the Netherlands and identified patients' and hospital characteristics associated with PT.
This nationwide, retrospective, population-based study included cTa/is, T1-4, N0-3, M0-1 bladder cancer patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry who underwent RC with curative intent between 1995 and 2013. PT-administration over time was compared with chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify characteristics associated with PT usage. The sub-groups cT2-4N0M0 and cT2-4, N0 or NX, M0 or MX were separately analysed.
In total, 10,338 patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty-six percent did not receive PT, 7.0% received NAC (or induction chemotherapy [IC]), 3.2% NAR, 1.8% AC, and 2.1% AR. NAC usage increased from 0.6% in 1995 to 21% in 2013 (p < 0.001), application of NAR decreased from 15% to 0.4% (p < 0.001). Usage of AC and AR in 2013 was <1.5%. Comparable temporal trends were found in 6032 patients staged cT2-4N0M0. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that younger age, ≥ cT3, ≥ cN1 and treatment in academic/teaching hospitals were associated with NAC or IC (all p < 0.05).
The increase in NAC administration in the Netherlands reflects a slow but steady adoption of evidence-based guidelines over the last two decades. Considerable variability in patients' and hospital characteristics in the likelihood of receiving NAC exists. Conversely, NAR, AR and AC are hardly administered anymore.
在欧洲,缺乏基于人群的围手术期治疗(PT)和根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的数据。我们评估了荷兰PT(新辅助化疗[NAC]、新辅助放疗[NAR]、辅助化疗[AC]、辅助放疗[AR])和RC的时间趋势,并确定了与PT相关的患者和医院特征。
这项全国性的回顾性人群研究纳入了1995年至2013年间荷兰癌症登记处中具有治愈意图且接受RC的cTa/is、T₁ - 4、N₀ - 3、M₀ - 1期膀胱癌患者。采用卡方检验比较不同时间的PT使用情况。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定与PT使用相关的特征。对cT2 - 4N0M0和cT2 - 4、N0或NX、M0或MX亚组分别进行分析。
共有10338例患者符合纳入标准。86%的患者未接受PT,7.0%接受NAC(或诱导化疗[IC]),3.2%接受NAR,1.8%接受AC,2.1%接受AR。NAC的使用从1995年的0.6%增至2013年的21%(p < 0.001),NAR的应用从15%降至0.4%(p < 0.001)。2013年AC和AR的使用率<1.5%。在6032例cT2 - 4N0M0期患者中发现了类似的时间趋势。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄较小、≥cT3、≥cN1以及在学术/教学医院接受治疗与NAC或IC相关(所有p < 0.05)。
荷兰NAC使用的增加反映了过去二十年来循证指南的缓慢但稳步的采用。在接受NAC可能性方面,患者和医院特征存在相当大的差异。相反,NAR、AR和AC几乎不再使用。