Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗在膀胱尿路上皮癌患者中的应用:临床医生的当前实践

The Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Current Practice Among Clinicians.

作者信息

Martini Thomas, Gilfrich Christian, Mayr Roman, Burger Maximilian, Pycha Armin, Aziz Atiqullah, Gierth Michael, Stief Christian G, Müller Stefan C, Wagenlehner Florian, Roigas Jan, Hakenberg Oliver W, Roghmann Florian, Nuhn Philipp, Wirth Manfred, Novotny Vladimir, Hadaschik Boris, Grimm Marc-Oliver, Schramek Paul, Haferkamp Axel, Colleselli Daniela, Kloss Birgit, Herrmann Edwin, Fisch Margit, May Matthias, Bolenz Christian

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Department of Urology, Urologische Klinik, Klinikum St. Elisabeth Straubing, Straubing, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Jun;15(3):356-362. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in clinical stages T2-T4a, cN0M0. We examined the frequency and current practice of NAC and sought to identify predictors for the use of NAC in a prospective contemporary cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed prospective data from 679 patients in the PROMETRICS (PROspective MulticEnTer RadIcal Cystectomy Series 2011) database. All patients underwent RC in 2011. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses identified predictors of NAC application. Furthermore, a questionnaire was used to evaluate the practice patterns of NAC at the PROMETRICS centers.

RESULTS

A total of 235 patients (35%) were included in the analysis. Only 15 patients (2.2%) received NAC before RC. Younger age (< 70 years; P = .035), lower case volume of the center (< 30 RC/year; P < .001), and advanced tumor stage (≥ cT3; P = .038) were identified as predictors for NAC. Of the 200 urologists who replied to the questionnaire, 69% (n = 125) declared tumor stage cT3-4 a/o N1M0 to be the best indication for NAC application, although 45% of the urologists stated that they would not perform NAC despite recommendations. The decision for NAC was made by the individual urologist in 69% of cases, and only 29% reported that all cases were discussed in an interdisciplinary tumor board.

CONCLUSION

NAC was rarely applied in the present cohort. We observed a discrepancy between guideline recommendations and practice patterns, despite medical indication and pre-therapeutic interdisciplinary discussion. The potential benefit of NAC within a multimodal approach seems to be neglected by many urologists.

摘要

引言

指南推荐对临床分期为T2 - T4a、cN0M0的膀胱尿路上皮癌患者在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)前进行新辅助化疗(NAC)。我们研究了NAC的使用频率和当前实践情况,并试图在一个前瞻性当代队列中确定使用NAC的预测因素。

材料与方法

我们分析了PROMETRICS(2011年前瞻性多中心根治性膀胱切除术系列)数据库中679例患者的前瞻性数据。所有患者均在2011年接受了RC。单变量和多变量回归分析确定了NAC应用的预测因素。此外,还使用了一份问卷来评估PROMETRICS中心NAC的实践模式。

结果

共有235例患者(35%)纳入分析。仅15例患者(2.2%)在RC前接受了NAC。年龄较小(<70岁;P = 0.035)、中心病例数较少(<30例RC/年;P < 0.001)和肿瘤分期较晚(≥cT3;P = 0.038)被确定为NAC的预测因素。在回复问卷的200名泌尿外科医生中,69%(n = 125)宣称肿瘤分期cT3 - 4a/o N1M0是NAC应用的最佳指征,尽管45%的泌尿外科医生表示尽管有推荐但他们不会进行NAC。69%的病例中NAC的决定由个体泌尿外科医生做出,只有29%报告称所有病例都在跨学科肿瘤委员会中进行了讨论。

结论

在本队列中NAC很少应用。尽管有医学指征和治疗前跨学科讨论,我们仍观察到指南推荐与实践模式之间存在差异。许多泌尿外科医生似乎忽视了NAC在多模式治疗方法中的潜在益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验