Suppr超能文献

预测自我评估和家长评估的同伴问题高发率——这对残疾学生来说是正常现象吗?

Predicting a high rate of self-assessed and parent-assessed peer problems--Is it typical for students with disabilities?

作者信息

Schwab Susanne, Gebhardt Markus, Hessels Marco G P, Nusser Lena

机构信息

University of Bielefeld, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.

TU Munich, School of Education, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.026. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

Abstract

Peer problems are common in children with special educational needs (SEN), but the reasons are poorly understood. This study aims to identify risk factors of peer problems (e.g., SEN, school setting, pro-social behaviour) for their occurrence. A subsample of 3900 children from the National Educational Panel Study in Germany was analysed. Children and parents answered the items of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) subscales 'peer problems' and 'pro-social behaviour'. Students with SEN (attending special schools or inclusive classes) were more likely to score within the abnormal range of the SDQ subscale peer problems than students without SEN. The results further show a low level of parent-child agreement on the subscale 'peer problems'. Logistic regression analyses showed that having SEN is always an explaining variable for 'peer problems' and that group differences cannot be fully explained by gender, school setting or 'pro-social behaviour'.

摘要

同伴问题在有特殊教育需求(SEN)的儿童中很常见,但其中的原因却鲜为人知。本研究旨在确定同伴问题(如特殊教育需求、学校环境、亲社会行为)发生的风险因素。对来自德国国家教育面板研究的3900名儿童的子样本进行了分析。儿童和家长回答了优势与困难问卷(SDQ)子量表“同伴问题”和“亲社会行为”的项目。有特殊教育需求的学生(就读于特殊学校或融合班级)比没有特殊教育需求的学生更有可能在SDQ子量表同伴问题的异常范围内得分。结果还显示,在“同伴问题”子量表上,亲子之间的一致性较低。逻辑回归分析表明,有特殊教育需求始终是“同伴问题”的一个解释变量,而且群体差异不能完全由性别、学校环境或“亲社会行为”来解释。

相似文献

1
Predicting a high rate of self-assessed and parent-assessed peer problems--Is it typical for students with disabilities?
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.026. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
2
[School well-being of students with and without special educational needs--a comparison of students in inclusive and regular classes].
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2015 Jul;43(4):265-74. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000363.
3
Social dimensions of inclusion in education of 4th and 7th grade pupils in inclusive and regular classes: Outcomes from Austria.
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Aug-Sep;43-44:72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
6
The impact of contact on students' attitudes towards peers with disabilities.
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Mar;62:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Social inclusion of students with special educational needs assessed by the Inclusion of Other in the Self scale.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250070. eCollection 2021.
9
[Βullying and the mental health of schoolchildren with special educational needs in primary education].
Psychiatriki. 2018 Apr-Jun;29(2):149-159. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2018.292.149.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验