Schwab Susanne, Gebhardt Markus, Hessels Marco G P, Nusser Lena
University of Bielefeld, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
TU Munich, School of Education, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.026. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Peer problems are common in children with special educational needs (SEN), but the reasons are poorly understood. This study aims to identify risk factors of peer problems (e.g., SEN, school setting, pro-social behaviour) for their occurrence. A subsample of 3900 children from the National Educational Panel Study in Germany was analysed. Children and parents answered the items of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) subscales 'peer problems' and 'pro-social behaviour'. Students with SEN (attending special schools or inclusive classes) were more likely to score within the abnormal range of the SDQ subscale peer problems than students without SEN. The results further show a low level of parent-child agreement on the subscale 'peer problems'. Logistic regression analyses showed that having SEN is always an explaining variable for 'peer problems' and that group differences cannot be fully explained by gender, school setting or 'pro-social behaviour'.
同伴问题在有特殊教育需求(SEN)的儿童中很常见,但其中的原因却鲜为人知。本研究旨在确定同伴问题(如特殊教育需求、学校环境、亲社会行为)发生的风险因素。对来自德国国家教育面板研究的3900名儿童的子样本进行了分析。儿童和家长回答了优势与困难问卷(SDQ)子量表“同伴问题”和“亲社会行为”的项目。有特殊教育需求的学生(就读于特殊学校或融合班级)比没有特殊教育需求的学生更有可能在SDQ子量表同伴问题的异常范围内得分。结果还显示,在“同伴问题”子量表上,亲子之间的一致性较低。逻辑回归分析表明,有特殊教育需求始终是“同伴问题”的一个解释变量,而且群体差异不能完全由性别、学校环境或“亲社会行为”来解释。