• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会包容:用“自我中的他人包容度量表”评估有特殊教育需要的学生。

Social inclusion of students with special educational needs assessed by the Inclusion of Other in the Self scale.

机构信息

Institute for Management Research, Nijmegen Center for Economics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250070. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0250070
PMID:33909648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081169/
Abstract

How does the participation of students with special educational needs (SEN) in mainstream education affect their social inclusion? We introduce a single-item pictorial measure, the Inclusion of Other in the Self (IOS), to compare the social inclusion of SEN students attending mainstream regular schools to social inclusion of SEN students attending special schools. We collected responses from 138 parents of SEN students aged 4-20, to obtain data on the loneliness, friendships and social inclusion of SEN students. The parents of SEN students attending regular schools did not perceive their children to be less included than parents of SEN students attending special schools. School context decreased SEN students' perceived loneliness independent of the school type. And while most SEN students' friendships were formed at school, SEN students attending regular schools had more friends, and these were more likely to live in the same neighborhood. Overall, the social inclusion of SEN students across school types was not affected by the school type, only by the school's inclusive characteristics.

摘要

特殊教育需求学生(SEN)参与主流教育如何影响他们的社会包容度?我们引入了一种单项图像测量方法,即自我包容中的他者(IOS),以比较在主流正规学校就读的 SEN 学生和在特殊学校就读的 SEN 学生的社会包容度。我们收集了 138 名 4-20 岁 SEN 学生家长的反馈,以获取 SEN 学生孤独感、友谊和社会包容度的数据。在正规学校就读的 SEN 学生的家长并不认为他们的孩子比在特殊学校就读的 SEN 学生更不被包容。学校环境独立于学校类型,减少了 SEN 学生的孤独感。虽然大多数 SEN 学生的友谊是在学校建立的,但在正规学校就读的 SEN 学生有更多的朋友,而且这些朋友更有可能住在同一个社区。总的来说,SEN 学生在不同学校类型之间的社会包容度不受学校类型的影响,而仅受学校包容性特征的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c1/8081169/cfc5e09ef8bb/pone.0250070.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c1/8081169/169d84d9a785/pone.0250070.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c1/8081169/8228e9ef1aac/pone.0250070.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c1/8081169/cfc5e09ef8bb/pone.0250070.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c1/8081169/169d84d9a785/pone.0250070.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c1/8081169/8228e9ef1aac/pone.0250070.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97c1/8081169/cfc5e09ef8bb/pone.0250070.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Social inclusion of students with special educational needs assessed by the Inclusion of Other in the Self scale.社会包容:用“自我中的他人包容度量表”评估有特殊教育需要的学生。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250070. eCollection 2021.
2
Social dimensions of inclusion in education of 4th and 7th grade pupils in inclusive and regular classes: Outcomes from Austria.奥地利全纳班级和普通班级中四、七年级学生教育全纳的社会维度:研究结果
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Aug-Sep;43-44:72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
3
The peer relations of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream primary schools: The importance of meaningful contact and interaction with peers.主流小学中具有特殊教育需求学生的同伴关系:与同伴进行有意义的接触和互动的重要性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Dec;89(4):818-837. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12262. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
4
Self-rated health and wellbeing among school-aged children with and without special educational needs: Differences between mainstream and special schools.学龄期有特殊教育需求和无特殊教育需求儿童的自评健康和幸福感:主流学校和特殊学校之间的差异。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Oct;81:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.021.
5
The role of cross-group friendship and emotions in adolescents' attitudes towards inclusion.跨群体友谊和情感在青少年对包容态度中的作用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Mar;62:137-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
Do learners with special education needs really feel included? Evidence from the Perception of Inclusion Questionnaire and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.特殊教育需求的学习者真的感到被包容了吗?来自包容感知问卷和困难与强项问卷的证据。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Dec;83:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
[School well-being of students with and without special educational needs--a comparison of students in inclusive and regular classes].[有特殊教育需求和无特殊教育需求学生的学校幸福感——融合班级与普通班级学生的比较]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2015 Jul;43(4):265-74. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000363.
8
Agreement among student, parent and teacher ratings of school inclusion: A multitrait-multimethod analysis.学生、家长和教师对学校包容性的评价一致性:多特质-多方法分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Oct;82:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Predicting a high rate of self-assessed and parent-assessed peer problems--Is it typical for students with disabilities?预测自我评估和家长评估的同伴问题高发率——这对残疾学生来说是正常现象吗?
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Feb-Mar;49-50:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.026. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Loneliness among students with special educational needs in mainstream seventh grade.主流七年级特殊教育需求学生的孤独感。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):1888-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Social inclusion as a perspective for the validation of the "DigCompEdu Check-In" questionnaire for teaching digital competence.将社会包容作为验证用于教学数字能力的“DigCompEdu签到”问卷的一个视角。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022 Sep 23:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11273-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Pair-Bonding as Inclusion of Other in the Self: A Literature Review.作为自我中对他人接纳的伴侣关系:文献综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02399. eCollection 2019.
2
Education of children with disabilities in New Delhi: When does exclusion occur?新德里残疾儿童的教育:排斥何时发生?
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183885. eCollection 2017.
3
A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion.一项评估社会包容度测量方法心理测量特性的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0179109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179109. eCollection 2017.
4
Social dimensions of inclusion in education of 4th and 7th grade pupils in inclusive and regular classes: Outcomes from Austria.奥地利全纳班级和普通班级中四、七年级学生教育全纳的社会维度:研究结果
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Aug-Sep;43-44:72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
5
Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being.超越金钱:走向幸福经济。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Jul;5(1):1-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x. Epub 2004 Jul 1.
6
How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?主观幸福感的衡量标准如何用于为公共政策提供信息?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):71-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x.
7
Measuring the Closeness of Relationships: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the 'Inclusion of the Other in the Self' Scale.测量关系的亲密度:对“自我中包含他人”量表的综合评估
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129478. eCollection 2015.
8
Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: an ecological model of social networks and community participation.界定智力和发育障碍者的社会融入:社会网络与社区参与的生态模型
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Mar;38:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
9
Mothers more altruistic than fathers, but only when bearing responsibility alone: evidence from parental choice experiments in Tanzania.母亲比父亲更具利他主义,但仅当独自承担责任时:来自坦桑尼亚父母选择实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e99952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099952. eCollection 2014.
10
More academics in regular schools? The effect of regular versus special school placement on academic skills in Dutch primary school students with Down syndrome.更多的特教老师进入普通学校?普通学校和特殊学校对唐氏综合征荷兰小学生学业技能的影响。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Jan;57(1):21-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01512.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.